<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Answers to taxing questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/19/answers-to-taxing-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/19/answers-to-taxing-questions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/19/answers-to-taxing-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=495#comment-424</guid>
		<description>I guess the issue is one of figuring out how you can copyright something that&#039;s shared so the issue then becomes which is important, the app or the data? But then it&#039;s also a case of to what extent would people develop an ning app? Worth looking at though. I&#039;ll follow up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the issue is one of figuring out how you can copyright something that&#8217;s shared so the issue then becomes which is important, the app or the data? But then it&#8217;s also a case of to what extent would people develop an ning app? Worth looking at though. I&#8217;ll follow up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/19/answers-to-taxing-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=495#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Hey Dennis,

I heard of Ning but I haven&#039;t played with it.

A friend of mine created an app in it but was disappointed to discover that Ning maintains copyright over the app - he had a couple of email conversations with Ning about this and they said they were looking into changing that but afaik nothing has changed yet. This would deter me from using Ning I have to say.

Having said that,  I&#039;d be embarrassed to be putting anything I coded into a public forum - people&#039;s worst suspicions about my intellect would be confirmed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dennis,</p>
<p>I heard of Ning but I haven&#8217;t played with it.</p>
<p>A friend of mine created an app in it but was disappointed to discover that Ning maintains copyright over the app &#8211; he had a couple of email conversations with Ning about this and they said they were looking into changing that but afaik nothing has changed yet. This would deter me from using Ning I have to say.</p>
<p>Having said that,  I&#8217;d be embarrassed to be putting anything I coded into a public forum &#8211; people&#8217;s worst suspicions about my intellect would be confirmed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/19/answers-to-taxing-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=495#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Thanks Neil - that&#039;s a presentational issue that can be solved through judicious styling.

The object of putting in categories was to provide an *initial* organisational framework. It&#039;s what I see as a weakness with the Any Answers thing - makes initial visual discovery difficult.

One of the big problems with tagging as I perceive  it is that everyone has a view on this and tags can vary enormously but I agree with you - seeding is a good idea.

You can of course take what I&#039;ve done, play with it some more and then put it up as one you&#039;ve rolled yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Neil &#8211; that&#8217;s a presentational issue that can be solved through judicious styling.</p>
<p>The object of putting in categories was to provide an *initial* organisational framework. It&#8217;s what I see as a weakness with the Any Answers thing &#8211; makes initial visual discovery difficult.</p>
<p>One of the big problems with tagging as I perceive  it is that everyone has a view on this and tags can vary enormously but I agree with you &#8211; seeding is a good idea.</p>
<p>You can of course take what I&#8217;ve done, play with it some more and then put it up as one you&#8217;ve rolled yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/19/answers-to-taxing-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=495#comment-421</guid>
		<description>I would get rid of the categories completely. The categories take up too much room on the screen. The main screen should just be a list of questions - just like any answers.

Much better to seed the tag list with the sort of keywords or phrases that might make good categories. That&#039;s what tags are - dynamic categories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would get rid of the categories completely. The categories take up too much room on the screen. The main screen should just be a list of questions &#8211; just like any answers.</p>
<p>Much better to seed the tag list with the sort of keywords or phrases that might make good categories. That&#8217;s what tags are &#8211; dynamic categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

