Comments on: Understanding the question http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/21/understanding-the-question/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: hugh macleod http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/21/understanding-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-434 hugh macleod Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:32:16 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=497#comment-434 1. Price 2. Quality 3. Service 4. Chemistry between the other three. Interesting stuff. 1. Price
2. Quality
3. Service
4. Chemistry between the other three.

Interesting stuff.

]]> By: David Terrar http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/21/understanding-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-433 David Terrar Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:54:52 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=497#comment-433 It was the way Thomas has skillfully positioned the new concept on EC that triggered my question. It was the way Thomas has skillfully positioned the new concept on EC that triggered my question.

]]> By: Dennis Howlett http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/21/understanding-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-432 Dennis Howlett Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:47:46 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=497#comment-432 Nip over to EC and see what he's done. Nip over to EC and see what he’s done.

]]> By: David Terrar http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/02/21/understanding-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-431 David Terrar Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:40:38 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=497#comment-431 I suspect Hugh's plan was to only give part of the story on purpose to gauge specific reaction on that compenent of the concept. I'd be interested in hearing if or how Thomas's final presentation and positioning of the idea to his audience was modified as a result of listening to all the dialogue. I suspect Hugh’s plan was to only give part of the story on purpose to gauge specific reaction on that compenent of the concept. I’d be interested in hearing if or how Thomas’s final presentation and positioning of the idea to his audience was modified as a result of listening to all the dialogue.

]]>