Inheritance Tax – a Simon Sweetman debate

by admin on February 27, 2006

in General

Inheritance Tax used to be something I’d deal with now and again and usually from a planning perspective. Over at AccountingWEB, Simon Sweetman has started a discussion around IHT that is attracting some pretty heated debate. I’m not sure about this one. It’s a complex debate hinging as it does around UK property values which have risen at a rate that leaves many people with genuine difficulty in getting on the UKs housing ladder. The same is true in Spain and when I was living in France there were rumblings among the locals that UK ex-pats were artificially inflating property prices.

Without diving down that particular road the fact remains that IHT is a now a tax due for serious reform. The total annual take on IHT has always been peripheral but it is easy to see how it might become an important component in the overall tax take stakes. And with the family home increasingly representing the largest single value asset in many person’s portfolio of total investments, it is understandable that people express concern.

Maybe Chancellor Gordon Brown could take an innovative step and simply exempt the family home from IHT. Defining ‘family home’ might take some doing but it shouldn’t be that difficult, should it?

Technorati Tags: ,

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

There is a lot of political apathy about IHT, which is surprising. The treasury does nicely out of it plus people who advise on it are not complaining.

Seems sensible. Couldn't the rules be made the same as exempting your home/residence from CGT?

I'm not thinking politically popular but of value to everyone who wishes to be a homeowner. I can't see Brown scrapping IHT - flies in the face of the current anti-avoidance trend.

the exemption you suggest would no doubt be politically popular, but would contribute to the increasing complexity of the tax system, and no doubt offer tax planning opportunity that some would then choose to attack.
The sensible thing to do is to scrap nonsense taxes like these - which would offer significant simplification, and thus fit with the current strategy of taking cost out of the collection process (at the moment they seem to be taking cost out and making it more complex, which is proving to be somewhat problematic).

Previous post:

Next post: