Storage or backup?

by admin on April 8, 2006

in Cloud Computing/SaaS

There is a fascinating article by Nigel Harris detailing the ever popular topic of online backup. It’s hellish detailed, a masterpiece of research but fundamentally flawed. Backup, as Nigel points out, is an expensive and risk sensitive issue. It should not be.

My entire business is now hosted somewhere or other and most likely in highly secure, bunkered data centres in obscure parts of the US. That’s because I don’t retain anything of value on the desktop. Not email. spreadsheets, documents – nada. Neither do I have any paper records. If someone else wants to print them, let them pay to chop down trees.

So the issue is a non-issue. Yet another benefit of running your business where the infrastructure is in the ether using SaaS.

Technorati Tags: ,

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Me again. Just been reading about Amazon's S3 storage service.

* Pay only for what you use. There is no minimum fee, and no start-up cost
* $0.15 per GB-Month of storage used
* $0.20 per GB of data transferred

I recently (on another website) started getting 20gb+/day downloads. It only lasted a few days but the one thing we needed was a service provider that could expand to cope with the demand rather than penalise us by shutting us down.

I'd much rather have bunged Amazon a few dollars than lose the people who were denied access to us during the downtime.

This service seems ideal for people who have no idea how popular their bulky online materials (podcasts, program files, shared work in progress) are going to be.

So you're a man who's comfortable knowing that Telefonica sits between you and your valuable information?

Cripes. They must be reliable.

Previous post:

Next post: