<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HMRC &#039;interventions&#039; &#8211; just say no?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/07/25/hmrc-interventions-just-say-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/07/25/hmrc-interventions-just-say-no/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Tebbutt</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/07/25/hmrc-interventions-just-say-no/comment-page-1/#comment-1460</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tebbutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/07/25/hmrc-interventions-just-say-no/#comment-1460</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m from the other side of the fence. I don&#039;t have the experience or interest to read some of your &#039;insider&#039; postings, although my eyes light up when software (as a service or not) appear.

Anyway, the HMRC stuff touched a nerve and I dropped Dennis an email. He suggested I share it with you, so here goes:

&quot;Dennis,

Re HMRC interventions.

I&#039;m just a humble taxpayer but it pisses me off when my accountant sends his annual &#039;insure yourself against our costs if you&#039;re investigated&#039; letters. &#039;They could be substantial&#039;. In other words try to frighten me into spending a goodly chunk of already limited profit. I may be insane, but I refuse to pay.&quot;

To which, let me add:

My accounts are so ridiculously simple, I cannot believe I would have to pay substantial fees to explain them to HMRC. I have always played it straight - paid high taxes in the good years and less in the bad.

The good years came before I started resenting the way my taxes were spent. At the time, I felt very fortunate to be able to return a chunk of my income to the common good. Now I just feel obliged to cough up, with some irritation.

Anyway, my point was that I resent getting what must be a standard letter which tries to frighten me into buying insurance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m from the other side of the fence. I don&#8217;t have the experience or interest to read some of your &#8216;insider&#8217; postings, although my eyes light up when software (as a service or not) appear.</p>
<p>Anyway, the HMRC stuff touched a nerve and I dropped Dennis an email. He suggested I share it with you, so here goes:</p>
<p>&#8220;Dennis,</p>
<p>Re HMRC interventions.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just a humble taxpayer but it pisses me off when my accountant sends his annual &#8216;insure yourself against our costs if you&#8217;re investigated&#8217; letters. &#8216;They could be substantial&#8217;. In other words try to frighten me into spending a goodly chunk of already limited profit. I may be insane, but I refuse to pay.&#8221;</p>
<p>To which, let me add:</p>
<p>My accounts are so ridiculously simple, I cannot believe I would have to pay substantial fees to explain them to HMRC. I have always played it straight &#8211; paid high taxes in the good years and less in the bad.</p>
<p>The good years came before I started resenting the way my taxes were spent. At the time, I felt very fortunate to be able to return a chunk of my income to the common good. Now I just feel obliged to cough up, with some irritation.</p>
<p>Anyway, my point was that I resent getting what must be a standard letter which tries to frighten me into buying insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

