<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining tax avoidance &#8211; official?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/12/13/defining-tax-avoidance-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/12/13/defining-tax-avoidance-official/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alastair</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/12/13/defining-tax-avoidance-official/comment-page-1/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2006/12/13/defining-tax-avoidance-official/#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>I have to say I read this differently.  I think it reflects a view that governments raise tax revenues, so tax is not a cost to them.  Gordon made a similar point recently in respect of the various Olympic projects - there was a spat about VAT missing from certain costings - he made the point that it was irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I read this differently.  I think it reflects a view that governments raise tax revenues, so tax is not a cost to them.  Gordon made a similar point recently in respect of the various Olympic projects &#8211; there was a spat about VAT missing from certain costings &#8211; he made the point that it was irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

