Reversing the appointment process

by admin on January 11, 2007

in Innovation

I use Google Calendar. I like I can share my calendar with whomever I need, which in turn means I can also ‘see’ other public calendars and those of my colleagues – when they choose to share. Using the calendar this way makes it easy to prevent obvious clashes. But there’s another and more attractive use.

Instead of arranging mutually agreed meeting times etc, I now suggest that anyone who wishes an appointment, set up it up in Google calendar. I get an email which includes a simple Yes/No for me to accept or reject that appointment plus set a reminder.

Most of the time this works really well. The advantage for those wishing an appointment is that it puts control back in their hands. This is important for most of my contacts because they work across different time zones. Conceptually, this is no different from the client who can’t get in to see you for several hours/days/weeks.

You don’t have to make your appointments diary public though as time goes on, I see little advantage in maintaining a private calendar, except in very specific competitive circumstances. Professionals might like to think in terms of confidentiality but does that extend to the simple task of making an appointment?

I can’t count the number of times I used to see clients at the office and they’d be chatting to other clients waiting to meet staff and partners. On reflection, it seems to me that was a useful social function but one which we never recognised or capitalised upon. We kid ourselves if we think clients don’t know about others for whom we act.

Technorati Tags: ,

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I've often felt that providing a public meeting place would offer a significant competitive advantage.

Dennis

I've recently adopted www.timetomeet.info, which is a web app, to arrange my apointments. It synchronises with Google calendar or any ical calendar, highlighting bookings already in your calendar.

From within timetomeet, you visually select on a calendar the times/dates you wish to offer others for a specific meeting. It supports multiple attendees and multiple time zone conversions. You select whether to send the invitees an email with a link from timetomeet or generates a link for you to embed in your own email.

The link takes the invitee to the calendar where they can see the times you've offered and they can select the times they prefer or add their own times. Thereafter timetomeet identifies mutually agreeable times for you to select (or add more times).

I've found this preferable to publishing my calendar for all to see for several reasons
- Most importantly, I will often wish to control the slots people can take so that my meetings are clustered together in time and location.
- Some meetings I have are confidential and I don't necessarily wish to impart who I am meeting. At the very least it's discourteous to your invitee as well.

Sadly my own online calendar app (www.airset.com), which is excellent in most respects, can't be configured to disclose whether slots are simply free/busy in a public calendar. I think that google calendar has the same problem.

I've found timetomeet invaluable in saving time arranging meetings, particularly involving more than one other person. Furthermore, its FREE and your invitees are not required to sign up as users (a practice I detest in other apps).

A similar app, albeit in private beta, is www.timebridge.com

I blogged on it here http://greatapps.blogspot.com/2006/12/easier-way-...

neat - do they support PDA access? - they do for GMail and Google maps...

Previous post:

Next post: