<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sage 50 Accounts Professional Online 2007 launched</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2007/02/22/sage-50-50-accounts-professional-online-2007-launched/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2007/02/22/sage-50-50-accounts-professional-online-2007-launched/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Salmon</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2007/02/22/sage-50-50-accounts-professional-online-2007-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Salmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2007/02/22/sage-50-50-accounts-professional-online-2007-launched/#comment-2755</guid>
		<description>Has there ever been a company (Sage) that has spent so little on developing its product over a 20 year period? You have to wonder what this latest half hearted attempt at providing a shareable service is supposed to be. I mean, Sage 24 , which was different but not terribly useful, was hatched how many years ago? And this Online 2007 service seems to be about one step up from that. To call it &#039;Professional&#039; to boot is just plain misleading. It&#039;s anything but. The Trading Standards Office should be alerted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has there ever been a company (Sage) that has spent so little on developing its product over a 20 year period? You have to wonder what this latest half hearted attempt at providing a shareable service is supposed to be. I mean, Sage 24 , which was different but not terribly useful, was hatched how many years ago? And this Online 2007 service seems to be about one step up from that. To call it &#039;Professional&#039; to boot is just plain misleading. It&#039;s anything but. The Trading Standards Office should be alerted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

