This doesn't happen often

by admin on April 2, 2007

in General

I’ve been bouncing mail back and forth with a tech company from the other side of the pond. They’re looking for UK/European PR representation and asked if I can make a recommendation. At times like this I hesitate. Tech PR is not over endowed with folk I’d regard as ‘bright.’ There are plenty of creative types but that’s not the same as bright.

Bright is what you get from people who listen to what you’re about, internalise it and then feed it back to you in a way that demonstrates they understand what you are about and the value you bring. Not the product. Today, product is assumed to be a given. If it’s not then you’ve got bigger problems than worrying about PR.

On this occasion I’m happy to make a recommendation. I’ve no idea if the introduction will go anywhere. But that’s not the point. It made me think about why we make certain types of connection. In this case, I knew immediately who I should be talking to. It’s not because this person has a platinum coated Rolodex. Or that we’ve not spoken for maybe 3 months. It’s because I know both parties and it struck me they’d make a good fit for each other.

I can only ever be the judge of what I think might work in a situation where I have incomplete information. I could be completely wrong. But that’s where the blog metaphor makes such a positive difference. It is impossible to hide in a blog. You get caught out sooner or later. But you can learn a great deal about people by reading what they say and then comparing that with what you hear in ‘the real world.’ Most people I know have pretty good BS detectors. They’re a standard fitting for most professionals.

In business relationships, it’s not who you know. It’s what you know about those you know that matters. In an increasingly socialised world, that is a dimension that is becoming easier to tap into.

Technorati Tags:

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Well my instinctive bias is towards the friends best suited to the job in question. That, and who would be most interested in a new job, either friends who are still settling into a "career" job (i.e., newer grads), or those who have "career" jobs but would be interested in something different.

I just have a few words to draw upon from up above, so the question is whether the firm needs a strong "communicator" or "techie". No doubt both are important, but it's a question of whether the subject matter in question is extremely difficult to comprehend and explain (in which case it would have to be a more techie-minded friend) which limits the field a bit.

Then I have a bunch of marketing/English friends who despite the 'softer' field are nevertheless very clever and could pick up most tech things.

Speaking of PR, I just lambasted someone for sucking at PR... http://krupo.ca/archive/2007/04/03/24567.aspx

Anyone I would recommend would take a more clever approach to such a disaster (or do their best to avoid it in the first place!) than Bobby.

So who would you choose and why?

Funny you should write about this. On the one hand, I have some very intelligent friends looking for work.

On the loosely related other hand, I also find myself inadvertently encouraging people in my firm to consider internal transfers into my department through a very soft-sell approach known as telling them about what I do and so on.

Previous post:

Next post: