The pain of disruption

by admin on May 24, 2007

in Innovation

Those who follow this blog will have maybe observed my over reporting of Twitter related stuff. There is a reason which I believe holds lessons for all professionals. Of itself, Twitter is a minor technical aberration that answers one thing well: ‘What are you doing?’ Marketers have jumped on the bandwagon and asked themselves: ‘How do we monetize this?’

Marketers get a free pass from me because I think they’re irrelevant and so can be indulged. What matters to me is a more fundamental question: ‘Why should I care about Twitter in a business context?’ I should say right out – I have no firm idea.  

I will also say up front that much of what Twitter offers is a mystery. Why for example should I care when you last farted, played golf or bought fish and chips except from some vicarious perspective? I want to DO something with Twitter. The more I think about what Twitter might deliver, the more scary it becomes. Twitter challenges my ingrained notions of how services and value are delivered.

I suspect that part of the problem is that *we* expect Twitter use cases to fall neatly into corporate, bullet point driven case studies that eulogise the technology accompanied by ROI. Twitter doesn’t work that way. Twitter operates at a far more fundamental level. It asks – for example:

  • Why do we need a prescribed methodology to test a service?
  • How does customer experience help us develop services rather than assuming a theory driven result?
  • How quickly can we adapt to potential customer experience BEFORE service rollout such that go live is optimised?
  • How the heck do we document this stuff such that we can learn for the future?

At a 500+ yard distance, the Twitterised landscape resembles semi-organised chaos. My sense is that the Pavlov Dog reaction to systematize everything we do is so pervasive that the disruption services like Twitter represent seriously challenge our ability to change. Even those that believe the current crop of technologies can foster change are wary. 

I believe we owe it to the next gen entrepreneurs to recognise the validity of the questions that Twitter raises as a proxy for innovation. Having witnessed 3 tech step changes over 25+ years, I am convinced the next step will seem more like a leap of faith than one of certainty. The ride will be rough and akin to the Paris-Dakar road race. The results will be beyond our wildest dreams.

Technorati tags:
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Point taken, it looks like there are a number of very interesting possibilities, the trick is how to self manage when in the midst of all this!

@Niel - I think for enterprisey types that's really the way to go.

@Susan - excellent point but if we're to work as super efficient 'real-time' knowledge workers then having this kind of ability is really useful and strengthens relationships we have. Example - a small group of use were able to help someone to resolve a relatively simple but annoying business problem in less than 15 minute. It started with: Does anyone know how to...

What I find truly encouraging is the fact this is totally democratic in feel. I don't need to worry that one person is a super smart/important/well-connected (add your own barrier style adjective) and I can get an answer.

I guess the bottom line is we're only at the beginning of this journey and finding what works and what doesn't at very low cost and risk is a big part of what makes my life fun.

This may seem a little off topic, but for me an important question regarding Twitter is more directly related to the title, not so much the content of your post.

Although the internet and recent advances in technology have provided us with lots of positives, there are also some negatives which provide us with a whole new set of challenges.

Do we need new ways to disrupt and distract ourselves from the full plates we already have?

Off the top of my head, how about Twitter channels for large, distributed groups working together (I'm thinking specifically of audit teams but there are obviously other applications) to aid communication. Group IM seems useful as long as it can be secured for sensitive business.

Previous post:

Next post: