Big Four – bringing the profession into disrepute

by admin on July 30, 2007

in Tax and Ethics

Nigel Harris reports that PR/marketing material from three of the Big Four implies that KPMG, PwC and E&Y are all ‘number 1′ in the UK. I have seen the KPMG banner Nigel refers to on Liverpool Street station. To their credit, Deloitte isn’t making comparable claims.

On a very strict interpretation, Nigel’s analysis could be described as tongue in cheek but there is a more serious point. Under the ethics rules, you can be guilty of bringing the profession into disrepute if you make false or misleading claims. Professional firms have to be very careful about advertising. Websites count. As we all know, companies often make claims that don’t really stand up but we usually recognise them for the BS they are.

I believe professionals have a special duty of care here because they are regarded as trusted advisors. They must therefore ensure that advertising statements are truly meaningful.

I wonder what ICAEW ethics committee has to say about this?

I can hear the pleadings already. Using the language of obfuscation, each would probably roll out the PR/marketing wonks to justify their position, bamboozling the Wise Men at Moorgate Place. It’s what our American cousins call ‘situational ethics.’ It’s what I call lies.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Three of four big audit firms do a poor job of communication?

No wonder my professors kept drilling in the importance of explaining what you're saying clearly, and how the big firms would come back to the universities and complain that they have lots of students who know how to add, but can't write. :p

this sounds like the big is best nonsense! professional relationships work best IMO on the basis of "what I do" rather than "what I say I do" - or as one of my colleagues used to say, "you are only as good as your last assignment".

Doesn't matter what the size of your organisation is - the only thing that really matters is how well you serve the interests of your clients. Personally I hope the ICAEW don't get involved in this - as it has the scope to waste an awful lot of our subs.

Previous post:

Next post: