BDO Seidman slammed with $521 million settlement

by admin on August 15, 2007

in Uncategorized

The Washington Post reports that BDO Seidman has been slammed with a $521 million total settlement including $351 million in punitive damages arising out of the ES Bankest negligence case. If the damages are upheld, this could seriously affect BDO’s ability to continue in its current form:

In testimony Tuesday, BDO Seidman attorney Adam Cole asked the company’s chief executive, Jack Weisbaum, whether the firm’s financial operations would stay the same if it had to pay punitive damages.

“Probably not,” Weisbaum said. “It would be very difficult. We certainly wouldn’t look the way we do now.”

BDO will appeal but in the meantime has posted a $50 million bond. Figures presented at the trial show that BDO had net worth of $171 million while the firm’s website says total fee income to June, 2007 was $589 million.

While the jury was instructed not to make a settlement that would kill off the firm, it is hard to see how BDO will survive in its present form, assuming of course that the judgment is upheld. A report in the Herald Tribune said that:

Banco Espirito Santo attorney Steven Thomas suggested that the firm may be able to handle the punitive damages if it makes some salary cuts among its 250 highly-paid partners, whom Weisbaum [BDO CEO] said receive an average of about $500,000 a year.

Regardless of the outcome, this has to be one of the most serious cases to impact the profession in recent times. At least as serious as the KPMG $456 million fraud case settlement.

Technorati Tags: ,

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Neil: this isn't fraud it's negligence - entirely different. The jury must have had facts that allowed it to impose the punitive penalty it fixed such that BDO Seidman doesn't get killed.

I presume there will be some level of insurance available to offset, they will appeal but even so it will cause a major problem.

BDO is not a global organization but a federated set of partnerships so there is unlikely to be a requirement for the global partners to dip in. Having said that, I would not be surprised to see something happen there. The question will be the extent to which the firm has to restructure if the decision is upheld.

Anderson should never have been killed but SEC was determined to make an example. Most of the UK people walked across the street to Deloitte after effectively holding a silent auction on clients.

Doesn't look like BDO has felony convictions for you to worry about, aside from the cash crunch, I think you're safe.

From wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Andersen
On June 15, 2002, Andersen was convicted of obstruction of justice for shredding documents related to its audit of Enron, resulting in the Enron scandal. Nancy Temple (Andersen Legal Dept.) and David Duncan (Lead Partner for the Enron account) were cited as the responsible managers in this scandal as they had given the order to shred relevant documents. Since the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not allow convicted felons to audit public companies, the firm agreed to surrender its licenses and its right to practice before the SEC on August 31, 2002. This effectively ended the company's operations.

How would this affect BDO worldwide? Is only the US arm in trouble?

For that matter, how did Enron bring down Arthur Andersen worldwide?

Previous post:

Next post: