Is Microsoft Office Accounting Professional a market killer?

by admin on November 20, 2007

Moap

While I was away, Nigel Harris did a great job running through the various aspects of Microsoft Office Accounting Professional 2008 (MOAP). Rather than reiterate what he says I’m looking at this from a market perspective.

Microsoft has been quietly eating away at the upper end of the SME market with its rebranded Dynamics suite, pulling business from a number of vendors but principally from Sage and Pegasus customers who are looking for an applications refresh. It hopes to do something similar at the next slice down the market.

Office integration is a serious tease that in part mirrors what Microsoft has done with SAP at the top end of the market with Duet. With 90%+ market share in office productivity software, it was always no brainer to provide the accounting piece of the puzzle. Pricing at free or £149 is another smart move. In reality, Microsoft could give the app away because even if it snags 10 million customers globally, it would make little discernible impact on earnings.

Integration with eBay and PayPal are also smart moves. However, customers should be aware they’ll take a significant hit on charges. Also, if they’re operating in multiple currencies with PayPal then expect to get little better than tourist currency conversion rates. When I last checked, PayPal was converting USD to Euros at 1.503 where Yahoo shows money market rates of 1.466.

But is the offering enough to woo professionals? Possibly. Nigel says that:

Sage, QuickBooks, MYOB, etc have been pushing out entry-level and micro-business products over the last couple of years, but it looks like time’s up – Office Accounting 2008 Express is totally FREE and does a far better job than many of the current small business accounting packages, so expect some realignment in the UK market. In the meantime, download a copy of the new software and get ready for a deluge of requests for help from small businesses. Look out for the launch of the Microsoft Professional Accounting Network

I wouldn’t be so quick off the mark with pre-announcing the demise of any of the incumbent players or expecting that customers will suddenly switch. It doesn’t work like that in the accounting market.

The Sage’s of this world already know the key to getting at the end user is through the professional. Clients have proven remarkably resilient at sticking with one or more of the low end packages. There’s also the assumption that professionals will know how to run with the package and that their clients will be ready to adopt. Nigel doesn’t offer any reason other than the ‘free’ Express offer. Adding a tad more confusion, in an endnote, Nigel says:

Microsoft states that its target market is small and micro businesses which use manual or speadsheet-based accounting records.

If that’s true then I sincerely hope Microsoft has a strong training program in place. At a first look on the accounting front MOAP is yet another accounting product that end users will need to understand. That means the user will need to know a lot more about accounting than the target market suggests. Throwing a sexy dashboard in front of an SME will barely register.

Let’s be clear what this is about – tethering clients to the Microsoft desktop and operating system. Nothing less. It’s a good way to go about it but has no guarantee of success. Microsoft will have to do a lot of convincing in the professional market. From what I’ve seen to date, I’m less than wowed and that is exactly what they will have to do for me to sit up and take notice. Wow me into believing the software is significantly superior to Line 50. Sex and sizzle alone will not be enough.

PS/Bonus link – here’s what Mike Prosceno has to say about community.

Technorati Tags: , ,

  • http://www.3ca.co.uk Stuart Jones

    When I looked at the UK version it was limited to a 60 day trial period.

  • http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howlett dah

    There is some confusion over this. The Express version is free but you really need the multi-user version which is not.

  • alastair

    OK, but do you think this is another toe in the water or do they have a strategy for the longer term. The only thing that seems clear is that they have worked out there is synergy between what they do now and accounting software – but I'm not convinced they understand the difference between ledgers and BI. And I am absolutely sure they don't really understand accountancy practices.

  • Graham

    Excuse me, Dennis? Is there anything INFERIOR to Line 50??

  • http://www.accmanpro.com Dennis Howlett

    They've got smart people in Paul White and Gary Turner in the apps division. Gary is probably closer to the ground on this one but you're right. They don't understand practitioners and that will be the Achilles Heel, unless they get busy on that score. As it happens, I know what they're doing about at least a part of that problem but can't say more as it relates to an NDA on a project where MSFT has some involvement.

    There is a long play here but expect a bit of confusion as they bed this one down. They really want it to succeed but there's a lot of product coming down the pipe. They will need to exercise care that the market doesn't end up totally confused. Don't forget we've got the 'new' slimmed down NAV to come and that's arguably a contender in this space as well.

  • http://www.accmanpro.com Dennis Howlett

    @Graham – yes there are but I'm not thinking in those terms. Remember Sage has created a very sticky brand identity and while we all love to hate them there's a tremendous amount of inertia behind the brand name.

    As an aside, Sage knows it has major challenges going forward but is taking steps to correct. Unfortunately, it has lost a number of fairly senior people in recent times so watch for any faltering in performance. Remember also, it's had a very bad time in the US so may be thinking of retrenching. That will come direct from marketing and we'll know more when the formal results statements and analyst days play out.

  • Graham

    Dennis, Line 50 should be consigned to history. If Sage are going to do anything it should be a completely new product from the ground up. Constant tinkering with a 25 year old program has got them the reputation they so richly deserve at the moment. I've not seen anything worse, and frankly the market is now awash with very usable accounting software. Microsoft is the only company though that can make an immediate and massive impact in the market. I've a feeling that Sage are not going to be able to match that.

  • http://www.accmanpro.com Dennis Howlett

    @graham: Sure – you're right I know but software companies have so much invested in their code it is surprisingly hard for them to get away. Ask SAP/Oracle. Same issues. Same with Microsoft and it's acquired code. Could say the same of CODA and many others.

    Saying that Microsoft CAN and WILL are two very different things. They don't have a rapport with professionals in the same way as say an Access or Sage. And they are very slow to move on opportunities but they do surprise from time to time and they are on a roll at the moment.

  • http://www.dynamicaccounting.net Mark Polino

    Dennis,

    I completely agree with your points. What's missing is that here in the US I sense quite a bit of QB fatigue. Other than maybe the blip of Peachtree, none of the other packages register for new business owners. QB is the default hands down. If nothing else, maybe Intuit will have to wake up to what a pig (and not all that cheap) Quickbooks has become and do something about it.

    Then there's the SQL Express backend in Microsoft's product. Don't even get me started on how much fun I can have in the BI and development space with a SQL Server back end.

    Mark

  • http://www.joshuafeinberg.net/ Joshua Feinberg&#039

    Microsoft has been in the past notorious for not providing a lot of training for products (at least those that are inexpensive!), so it can be a real challenge when something new comes out. Often they provide great support information with their products, but reading a training manual – online or in booklet form – is not always the best for everyone. Even working with a computerized tutorial does not always cater to the learning styles of many … and not every accountant is a wiz at IT either and sometimes Microsoft can design its products with a computer consultant in mind. A good idea for accountants that work often with computer systems and use them as an integral part of their businesses (which is many!) is to get a good computer consulting professional to help deal with support and the ins and outs of software and systems. This can take some of the pressure off and allow time to actually work with clients and do important aspects of running a business.

Previous post:

Next post: