<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: How to save 43% on audit fees: dump Deloitte</title> <atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/</link> <description>never knowingly under opinionated</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Dennis Howlett</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/comment-page-1/#comment-171647</link> <dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:23:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/#comment-171647</guid> <description>Thanks for the clarification - it would have helped to have said that re: Deloitte. The piece is really unclear on what tier 2 can and cannot handle. It seems to me, and this is a myth perpetuated in the UK as well, that if you&#039;re not Big Four then in some way you&#039;re not qualified. Without adequate qualification, that&#039;s nonsense and a convenient perpetuation of the status quo.Of course there will be circumstances where a non-Big Four will not have the bandwidth or technical capability. But then we&#039;ve seen enough failure among the Big Four to seriously question just how &#039;superior&#039; they really are.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification &#8211; it would have helped to have said that re: Deloitte. The piece is really unclear on what tier 2 can and cannot handle. It seems to me, and this is a myth perpetuated in the UK as well, that if you&#8217;re not Big Four then in some way you&#8217;re not qualified. Without adequate qualification, that&#8217;s nonsense and a convenient perpetuation of the status quo.</p><p>Of course there will be circumstances where a non-Big Four will not have the bandwidth or technical capability. But then we&#8217;ve seen enough failure among the Big Four to seriously question just how &#8217;superior&#8217; they really are.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sarah Johnson</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/comment-page-1/#comment-171642</link> <dc:creator>Sarah Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/#comment-171642</guid> <description>Thanks for referencing one of CFO.com&#039;s stories. Just to clarify, Deloitte did not &quot;spin&quot; anything for us. In fact, Deloitte wouldn&#039;t talk to us for this piece. The numbers show that the Fortune 1000 stick with the Big Four (hence the &quot;in general&quot;). Stonefield itself and other small auditors I&#039;ve spoken with admit they don&#039;t always have the technical expertise that a Big Four has -- but often that&#039;s OK for smaller clients.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for referencing one of CFO.com&#8217;s stories. Just to clarify, Deloitte did not &#8220;spin&#8221; anything for us. In fact, Deloitte wouldn&#8217;t talk to us for this piece. The numbers show that the Fortune 1000 stick with the Big Four (hence the &#8220;in general&#8221;). Stonefield itself and other small auditors I&#8217;ve spoken with admit they don&#8217;t always have the technical expertise that a Big Four has &#8212; but often that&#8217;s OK for smaller clients.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/22 queries in 0.262 seconds using disk

Served from: www.accmanpro.com @ 2010-03-19 00:54:37 -->