<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to save 43% on audit fees: dump Deloitte</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/comment-page-1/#comment-4407</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/#comment-4407</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification - it would have helped to have said that re: Deloitte. The piece is really unclear on what tier 2 can and cannot handle. It seems to me, and this is a myth perpetuated in the UK as well, that if you&#039;re not Big Four then in some way you&#039;re not qualified. Without adequate qualification, that&#039;s nonsense and a convenient perpetuation of the status quo.

Of course there will be circumstances where a non-Big Four will not have the bandwidth or technical capability. But then we&#039;ve seen enough failure among the Big Four to seriously question just how &#039;superior&#039; they really are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification &#8211; it would have helped to have said that re: Deloitte. The piece is really unclear on what tier 2 can and cannot handle. It seems to me, and this is a myth perpetuated in the UK as well, that if you&#039;re not Big Four then in some way you&#039;re not qualified. Without adequate qualification, that&#039;s nonsense and a convenient perpetuation of the status quo.</p>
<p>Of course there will be circumstances where a non-Big Four will not have the bandwidth or technical capability. But then we&#039;ve seen enough failure among the Big Four to seriously question just how &#039;superior&#039; they really are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/comment-page-1/#comment-4406</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/12/how-to-save-43-on-audit-fees-dump-deloitte/#comment-4406</guid>
		<description>Thanks for referencing one of CFO.com&#039;s stories. Just to clarify, Deloitte did not &quot;spin&quot; anything for us. In fact, Deloitte wouldn&#039;t talk to us for this piece. The numbers show that the Fortune 1000 stick with the Big Four (hence the &quot;in general&quot;). Stonefield itself and other small auditors I&#039;ve spoken with admit they don&#039;t always have the technical expertise that a Big Four has -- but often that&#039;s OK for smaller clients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for referencing one of CFO.com&#039;s stories. Just to clarify, Deloitte did not &quot;spin&quot; anything for us. In fact, Deloitte wouldn&#039;t talk to us for this piece. The numbers show that the Fortune 1000 stick with the Big Four (hence the &quot;in general&quot;). Stonefield itself and other small auditors I&#039;ve spoken with admit they don&#039;t always have the technical expertise that a Big Four has &#8212; but often that&#039;s OK for smaller clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

