More on social computing: Hugh and I

by admin on January 15, 2008

in Featured,General,Innovation

I had a long conversation with Hugh McLeod to help figure out what the heck I’m doing on the ‘social’ bit I introduced yesterday. I wanted to figure how the conversation in the last post could be taken forward and with that in mind I’m sharing my thoughts about how this works in the professional context. Hugh was gracious enough to help me keep it simple.

If social accounting is going to mean anything then it needs to have a social object around which the community can gather, share ideas and handle their issues. This sounds nuts until you read what this means. Seth Godin who has been preaching edge marketing for more years than most quotes Hugh:

You make what my friend Hugh MacLeod calls “social objects”—things that people want to talk about. That’s what the iPhone is. People say the iPhone was superhyped, but Apple didn’t hype it. People hyped it to each other. The challenge is not “How do I spend $50 million on advertising?” The challenge is “How do I spend $50 million on product development, so I can make a product people will talk about?”

In the past, this would have been a closed forum to which only paying customers gain access. We don’t think that makes sense. Taking a leaf out of Seesmic‘s open community playbook, we’re starting to develop a set of social objects around which customers can meet.

GetSatisfaction is one, DailyMotion is another, where we’ll post videos about what’s happening. Anyone can join these groups, ask questions, raise queries, give their points of view. They are the (current) objects around which people are talking about FreeAgent. And we don’t want any barriers to their being able to do that. It’s way beyond blogs. As we get ready to go international, this gets to be really important because we’re going to find ourselves facing all sorts of issues we can’t imagine right now.

The video at the top? It talks about trust and how you have to build it. It’s by Loic LeMeur and was made on a recent visit to Stanford University campus. Loic’s another friend who is super smart.

So here’s the interesting bit from the professional perspective. Check out Stuart’s comment. Interesting?

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

All these things work in their own way and *can* be proxies for what we're talking about here. In this case we want to keep things as loose as possible right now to see how it works. The DailyMotion thing is another experiment in that line of thinking.

Yep - point well made about moving stuff but in GS case, they're publishing an API 'soon' so we can then get at the data we need. Hopefully

to take your example you could add a third item on the openness number line, being a Wiki. Provided editorial rights are easy to obtain!

But how about if you wanted to take a thread, and then move it into a new forum. Links are OK but somewhat limited. You might want to actually embed objects from other tools, as an example - which is a bit more beyond text, or even video. Perhaps it might be a mind map for example - or even a pivot in a spreadsheet.

I don't have an agenda here - its just some emerging thoughts!

Not sure I'm fully understanding. Let me try. A set of blogs could be considered an aggregated social object. Forums have been free for years or at least v. low cost. But they have weaknesses. I believe that by remaining open (but managing in a light touch fashion) we can create a much stronger sense of stickiness. Our job is in curating.

I'd contrast this to the traditional support site or FAQ arrangement which is very much one on one and which degrades over time.

do you think these social objects are open only in the sense that you don't have to pay to use them, or do you think it extends such that you can also change them?

Previous post:

Next post: