<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HMRC and IRS catching more tax evaders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/23/hmrc-and-irs-catching-more-tax-evaders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/23/hmrc-and-irs-catching-more-tax-evaders/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:26:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/01/23/hmrc-and-irs-catching-more-tax-evaders/comment-page-1/#comment-4455</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accmanpro.cordelia.titaninternet.co.uk/index.php/2008/01/23/hmrc-and-irs-catching-more-tax-evaders/#comment-4455</guid>
		<description>Hardly worth the collection costs indeed BUT don&#039;t underestimate the deterrent effect of lots of smaller (and some bigger) settlements arising from enquiries into the self employed&#039;s tax returns.

I believe that the tax take would go up if there were more people telling their mates about how they&#8217;d been caught out by the Revenue. That would require more investigations (risk based and random) so as to catch out more people who have tried it on. I&#8217;m afraid that human nature being what it is there are probably plenty of people sailing close to the wind and also a goodly number who consciously underdeclare their self employed income.

As things stand I&#039;d bet that lots of people &#039;down the pub&#039;, &#039;at the golf club&#039; and elsewhere swap stories about what they&#039;ve &#039;got away with&#039; than about how they&#039;ve been caught out.

Until and unless that situation changes the headline figures of tax collected through investigations will have no impact on the chancers who do not pay the &#039;right&#039; amount of tax.

As far as they&#039;re concerned, none of their mates have been caught so those big numbers must relate to the big boys. After all, the Revenue are no longer interested in &#039;small fry&#039;. At least that&#039;s my view of the general perception.

So my take on this is that, whilst the smallest of settlements probably weren&#039;t worth the effort, there need to be far more enquiries (which should be settled on a fair and equitable basis) to ensure that we have a more compliant population and less under reporting and evasion.

In summary: Over the last ten years there has been a systemic failure by the Revenue to ensure that cheating tax payers are discouraged and honest taxpayers encouraged to fully declare their income.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly worth the collection costs indeed BUT don&#039;t underestimate the deterrent effect of lots of smaller (and some bigger) settlements arising from enquiries into the self employed&#039;s tax returns.</p>
<p>I believe that the tax take would go up if there were more people telling their mates about how they&rsquo;d been caught out by the Revenue. That would require more investigations (risk based and random) so as to catch out more people who have tried it on. I&rsquo;m afraid that human nature being what it is there are probably plenty of people sailing close to the wind and also a goodly number who consciously underdeclare their self employed income.</p>
<p>As things stand I&#039;d bet that lots of people &#039;down the pub&#039;, &#039;at the golf club&#039; and elsewhere swap stories about what they&#039;ve &#039;got away with&#039; than about how they&#039;ve been caught out.</p>
<p>Until and unless that situation changes the headline figures of tax collected through investigations will have no impact on the chancers who do not pay the &#039;right&#039; amount of tax.</p>
<p>As far as they&#039;re concerned, none of their mates have been caught so those big numbers must relate to the big boys. After all, the Revenue are no longer interested in &#039;small fry&#039;. At least that&#039;s my view of the general perception.</p>
<p>So my take on this is that, whilst the smallest of settlements probably weren&#039;t worth the effort, there need to be far more enquiries (which should be settled on a fair and equitable basis) to ensure that we have a more compliant population and less under reporting and evasion.</p>
<p>In summary: Over the last ten years there has been a systemic failure by the Revenue to ensure that cheating tax payers are discouraged and honest taxpayers encouraged to fully declare their income.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

