You are here: Home » Asides » Blogs win over mainstream media

Blogs win over mainstream media

by Dennis Howlett on February 2, 2008

techmemeThis is almost completely off topic but I’ll spin it back. Back in 2002, veteran blogger and RSS inventor Dave Winer placed a $1,000 bet that by 2007, bloggers would outstrip mainstream media as a Google searched resource. The actual bet wording said:

In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of 2007, weblogs will rank higher than the New York Times’ Web site.

The result was announced yesterday. Blogs win.Well done Dave. As one might imagine, every part of the bet and its subsequent outcome are the subject of debate. Trouble is there’s no disputing a 4:1 majority on the chosen topics.

I count AccountancyAge and AccountingWEB as mainstream media. I doubt they see it that way. AccMan’s been going about 30 months. AccountingWEB has been around since 1997 and AccountancyAge came to market when God was a lad. I don’t think I’m doing badly when you consider the editorial, sales, marketing and other efforts the other two have to put in in order to attract an audience. Check out Compete to see what I mean.

From a professional perspective this can only mean one thing. Set yourself out as an authority on a topic area and you can do well in Google searches. As we all know, people looking for advice will likely use Google as a first port of call. If your name crops up frequently enough then you are likely to score in the trust stakes. That matters. And it is th cheapest form of advertising you’ll find on the planet

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Nice to see a technology related prediction coming true.

    Well done on your achievement Dennis. I had a look at Compete.com which is a site I haven't seen before. First impressions were very positive then as I looked around I wondered if it's as useful as I had first thought.

    Comparing traffic across your own site and that of others is likely to lead to a focus on visitor numbers. Nice as it is to beat one's competitors in this regard, for me what matters is the number of visitors who engage with me, register on the site and use our services. With the TaxAdviceNetwork for example I could simply aim for high visitor numbers by promoting the site to the public at large. In practice our main target is accountants in practice. It's a smaller population so I'm not aiming to compete with tax advice sites that are aimed at the public.

    Is there an argument to go for high levels of site traffic regardless?
  • I was comparing apples and apples so I'm not concerned on the numbers front. You are correct on the question of influence which is what you're really alluding to. The way I measure that is to think about the kinds of engagement I have that don't feature on the blog but from which I derive the bulk of my income. None of those would exist without the exposure the blog has given me.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: