<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Blogs win over mainstream media</title> <atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/</link> <description>never knowingly under opinionated</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Dennis Howlett</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-174578</link> <dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:15:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/#comment-174578</guid> <description>I was comparing apples and apples so I&#039;m not concerned on the numbers front. You are correct on the question of influence which is what you&#039;re really alluding to. The way I measure that is to think about the kinds of engagement I have that don&#039;t feature on the blog but from which I derive the bulk of my income. None of those would exist without the exposure the blog has given me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was comparing apples and apples so I&#8217;m not concerned on the numbers front. You are correct on the question of influence which is what you&#8217;re really alluding to. The way I measure that is to think about the kinds of engagement I have that don&#8217;t feature on the blog but from which I derive the bulk of my income. None of those would exist without the exposure the blog has given me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Lee</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-174332</link> <dc:creator>Mark Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:05:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/#comment-174332</guid> <description>Nice to see a technology related prediction coming true.Well done on your achievement Dennis. I had a look at Compete.com which is a site I haven&#039;t seen before. First impressions were very positive then as I looked around I wondered if it&#039;s as useful as I had first thought.Comparing traffic across your own site and that of others is likely to lead to a focus on visitor numbers. Nice as it is to beat one&#039;s competitors in this regard, for me what matters is the number of visitors who engage with me, register on the site and use our services. With the TaxAdviceNetwork for example I could simply aim for high visitor numbers by promoting the site to the public at large. In practice our main target is accountants in practice. It&#039;s a smaller population so I&#039;m not aiming to compete with tax advice sites that are aimed at the public.Is there an argument to go for high levels of site traffic regardless?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see a technology related prediction coming true.</p><p>Well done on your achievement Dennis. I had a look at Compete.com which is a site I haven&#8217;t seen before. First impressions were very positive then as I looked around I wondered if it&#8217;s as useful as I had first thought.</p><p>Comparing traffic across your own site and that of others is likely to lead to a focus on visitor numbers. Nice as it is to beat one&#8217;s competitors in this regard, for me what matters is the number of visitors who engage with me, register on the site and use our services. With the TaxAdviceNetwork for example I could simply aim for high visitor numbers by promoting the site to the public at large. In practice our main target is accountants in practice. It&#8217;s a smaller population so I&#8217;m not aiming to compete with tax advice sites that are aimed at the public.</p><p>Is there an argument to go for high levels of site traffic regardless?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/22 queries in 0.027 seconds using disk

Served from: www.accmanpro.com @ 2010-03-15 07:29:31 -->