<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs win over mainstream media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-4475</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 01:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/#comment-4475</guid>
		<description>I was comparing apples and apples so I&#039;m not concerned on the numbers front. You are correct on the question of influence which is what you&#039;re really alluding to. The way I measure that is to think about the kinds of engagement I have that don&#039;t feature on the blog but from which I derive the bulk of my income. None of those would exist without the exposure the blog has given me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was comparing apples and apples so I&#039;m not concerned on the numbers front. You are correct on the question of influence which is what you&#039;re really alluding to. The way I measure that is to think about the kinds of engagement I have that don&#039;t feature on the blog but from which I derive the bulk of my income. None of those would exist without the exposure the blog has given me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comment-4474</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/02/02/blogs-win-over-mainstream-media/#comment-4474</guid>
		<description>Nice to see a technology related prediction coming true.

Well done on your achievement Dennis. I had a look at Compete.com which is a site I haven&#039;t seen before. First impressions were very positive then as I looked around I wondered if it&#039;s as useful as I had first thought.

Comparing traffic across your own site and that of others is likely to lead to a focus on visitor numbers. Nice as it is to beat one&#039;s competitors in this regard, for me what matters is the number of visitors who engage with me, register on the site and use our services. With the TaxAdviceNetwork for example I could simply aim for high visitor numbers by promoting the site to the public at large. In practice our main target is accountants in practice. It&#039;s a smaller population so I&#039;m not aiming to compete with tax advice sites that are aimed at the public.

Is there an argument to go for high levels of site traffic regardless?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see a technology related prediction coming true.</p>
<p>Well done on your achievement Dennis. I had a look at Compete.com which is a site I haven&#039;t seen before. First impressions were very positive then as I looked around I wondered if it&#039;s as useful as I had first thought.</p>
<p>Comparing traffic across your own site and that of others is likely to lead to a focus on visitor numbers. Nice as it is to beat one&#039;s competitors in this regard, for me what matters is the number of visitors who engage with me, register on the site and use our services. With the TaxAdviceNetwork for example I could simply aim for high visitor numbers by promoting the site to the public at large. In practice our main target is accountants in practice. It&#039;s a smaller population so I&#039;m not aiming to compete with tax advice sites that are aimed at the public.</p>
<p>Is there an argument to go for high levels of site traffic regardless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

