You are here: Home » General » Does sustainability matter?

Does sustainability matter?

by Dennis Howlett on February 18, 2008

versionone.jpgEarlier today I spoke with VersionOne, the paperless office company. I was interested in discovering what motivates their customers to buy into the relatively mature document management market.

Recently VersionOne has been trying to play up the sustainability card but according to its PR, the company finds it something of an uphill struggle. Her opinion is that it might take legislation to get people wired into the idea. I disagree.

Professionals understand an economic case but I wonder how well it has been made. VersionOne claims an average ROI of sub-6 months. That’s pretty good for any significant technology investment. So what about the sustainability elements:

A typical HP laserjet printer, which uses 5.628 kWH/week emits 13.170 lbs CO2 per week

A typical photocopier uses 400 watts per hour on standby = 16kWH for a 40 hour working week = 37.44 lbs CO2 per week

Annualised for say a 46 week working year equates to 2,328.06 lbs per annum. This is for a single machine of each type. Assuming of course the machines are switched off at holiday closure times.

Persuading clients to accept electronic copies of their accounts might be a stretch but given that we’re all moving to electronic filing over the course of the next couple of years might be enough of an incentive to at least rethink how much the profession really needs paper. By taking a pro-active stance on this topic, professionals position themselves as responsible corporate citizens while opening up the potential for consulting engagements based on real life experience.

As an aside VersionOne is more attractive than other offerings I’ve seen because while it integrates with many financial packages, the data it generates is portable between systems. Unlike the usual mantra of ‘one stop’ computing, it means companies that may be considering systems migration don’t have to re=engineer their DM solution.

GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark
  • Being 'green' of itself isn't going to get anyone very far. Explain the economics and you're in with a shout. @Jason - love EchoSign: pity compliance officers get in the way at my bank on that one.
  • It does matter, but today, mainly if you can have your cake and eat it too. Marking the "green" aspects of EchoSign has been the single least fruitful marketing effort we have done ;) But, once they pay for something they want, they are very pleased to get the green benefits and even evangelize them ...
  • Speaking as someone who is keen on paperless technology, let me say that I don't bleed green. Maybe that's a sales pitch to other business owners but not me. And anyway, we have another ice age coming due to sunspot activity, don't we? The "green" bandwagon seems like a giant church campout "feel good" sing-along with little critical thinking. Inauthentic.

    Paperless office stuff is fabulous.

    We use www.worldox.com as a document management solution and in 8 years of use it is the only software that has never given us grief.

    Everyone gets a REALLY GOOD scanner at their desk + Worldox = Total World Domination.

    Now we're looking at switching to the Mac for our offices (we're a high end boutique of international tax lawyers and yes we do fixed pricing and not hourly pricing thank you very much) and unfortunately the equivalent software does not exist there. That unfortunately means we are shackled to our Windows workstations.


    Dear Apple, Inc.: You would blow the small business market wide open if you facilitate relentlessly simple paperless office systems. Time Machine and Time Capsule give you a big chunk of the solution. You need a product like Worldox on OS X. Love, Phil.


    @philiphodgen
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: