<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing isn&#039;t advertising, is it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizzhy</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4615</link>
		<dc:creator>Bizzhy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/#comment-4615</guid>
		<description>Advertising is a part of marketing. Marketing has several faces from requirement analysis to sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertising is a part of marketing. Marketing has several faces from requirement analysis to sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tamblyn</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4614</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tamblyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/#comment-4614</guid>
		<description>Classic old marketing - I almost expected to see reference to the 4 P&#039;s...Good marketers now work out where their ROI is coming from and when - and typically have better intelligence to back this up. You&#039;re right - more likely to consider is hardly a measure of success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic old marketing &#8211; I almost expected to see reference to the 4 P&#039;s&#8230;Good marketers now work out where their ROI is coming from and when &#8211; and typically have better intelligence to back this up. You&#039;re right &#8211; more likely to consider is hardly a measure of success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ripe</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4613</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/#comment-4613</guid>
		<description>All the love that Hugh had for Stormhoek still did not prevent Orbital going down the tubes because of a greedy exec in Jason Korman. Pity that the balance is still tipped in favour of the blood sucking elite. Unfortunately Hugh is still hanging with Korman. Real tough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the love that Hugh had for Stormhoek still did not prevent Orbital going down the tubes because of a greedy exec in Jason Korman. Pity that the balance is still tipped in favour of the blood sucking elite. Unfortunately Hugh is still hanging with Korman. Real tough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4612</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/#comment-4612</guid>
		<description>As if on cue, a blog post comes saying &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/03/17/gap-advertisers-audience-growing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;advertisers are clueless when it comes to the internet&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if on cue, a blog post comes saying <a href="http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/03/17/gap-advertisers-audience-growing/" rel="nofollow">advertisers are clueless when it comes to the internet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4611</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/#comment-4611</guid>
		<description>@M: Obsolete is perhaps too strong a term right now but you only have to look at the viewing figures to realise that people&#039;s viewing patterns are changing. The younger generation in particular spends little time in front of the TV, preferring the &#039;entertainment&#039; they can get on the Internet. No-one has figured a successful model for monetizing that content (yet) indicating that advertising in this medium would not be welcome.  But again, we haven&#039;t seen the sort of experimentation and failure necessary where innovation is concerned to &#039;know&#039; what is likely to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@M: Obsolete is perhaps too strong a term right now but you only have to look at the viewing figures to realise that people&#039;s viewing patterns are changing. The younger generation in particular spends little time in front of the TV, preferring the &#039;entertainment&#039; they can get on the Internet. No-one has figured a successful model for monetizing that content (yet) indicating that advertising in this medium would not be welcome.  But again, we haven&#039;t seen the sort of experimentation and failure necessary where innovation is concerned to &#039;know&#039; what is likely to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Coltman</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4610</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Coltman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/#comment-4610</guid>
		<description>Dennis, do you think TV advertising will become obsolete then?

M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, do you think TV advertising will become obsolete then?</p>
<p>M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Yankelovich</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4608</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Yankelovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/#comment-4608</guid>
		<description>Dennis,

&quot;We have the tools, we only need the ingenuity and courage to go out there and say something both compelling and different.&quot;

That requires a lot of real thinking which is not easy to buy. I am not sure Stormhoek campaign said anything compelling, but it surely said it compellingly different.

I have read your earlier blog about sponsored feeds vs AdSense type of advertising, but since I am new to all this, I could not understand the model and how it works. Could you point the place I could learn this? Thank you in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>&quot;We have the tools, we only need the ingenuity and courage to go out there and say something both compelling and different.&quot;</p>
<p>That requires a lot of real thinking which is not easy to buy. I am not sure Stormhoek campaign said anything compelling, but it surely said it compellingly different.</p>
<p>I have read your earlier blog about sponsored feeds vs AdSense type of advertising, but since I am new to all this, I could not understand the model and how it works. Could you point the place I could learn this? Thank you in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4609</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/#comment-4609</guid>
		<description>@Gregory - if you follow the Stormhoek model then it achieves by being compellingly different so to the extent it isn&#039;t overly compelling &lt;strong&gt;of itself&lt;/strong&gt; didn&#039;t matter.

As to the sponsored feeds thing - this is very much an experiment into discovering what works and what doesn&#039;t. My belief is that content matters to the point of being a compelling differentiator. Everyone who has seen the concept is intrigued but in truth we don&#039;t know if it will work or to what extent it will be successful. Others have faith and that&#039;s what counts.

On AdSense - I&#039;m agnostic leaning towards anti- because the advertiser isn&#039;t necessarily rewarded on results but only on clicks. There is also the assumption that consumers are actively looking for something whereas I may only be information gathering. However, those who do use AdSense say it works for them more times than it doesn&#039;t and therefore the pay per drink model is worthwhile following.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gregory &#8211; if you follow the Stormhoek model then it achieves by being compellingly different so to the extent it isn&#8217;t overly compelling <strong>of itself</strong> didn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>As to the sponsored feeds thing &#8211; this is very much an experiment into discovering what works and what doesn&#8217;t. My belief is that content matters to the point of being a compelling differentiator. Everyone who has seen the concept is intrigued but in truth we don&#8217;t know if it will work or to what extent it will be successful. Others have faith and that&#8217;s what counts.</p>
<p>On AdSense &#8211; I&#8217;m agnostic leaning towards anti- because the advertiser isn&#8217;t necessarily rewarded on results but only on clicks. There is also the assumption that consumers are actively looking for something whereas I may only be information gathering. However, those who do use AdSense say it works for them more times than it doesn&#8217;t and therefore the pay per drink model is worthwhile following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Coltman</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4606</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Coltman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/#comment-4606</guid>
		<description>Who was it said that marketing is finding out what the customer wants (x) and then making sure you give it to them?  I think it was John Jansch in his excellent book &quot;Duct Tape Marketing&quot;.

That definitely isn&#039;t an alternative definition of advertising.  Would it be too simplistic a view to say that advertising should come after marketing and should be making sure the customer knows you can give them (x)?

M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who was it said that marketing is finding out what the customer wants (x) and then making sure you give it to them?  I think it was John Jansch in his excellent book &quot;Duct Tape Marketing&quot;.</p>
<p>That definitely isn&#039;t an alternative definition of advertising.  Would it be too simplistic a view to say that advertising should come after marketing and should be making sure the customer knows you can give them (x)?</p>
<p>M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/marketing-isnt-advertising-is-it/#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>In the traditional view of marketing, advertising plays a large part. The problem is that it has been proven to be a broken model if it is for lead generation purposes. It&#039;s fine for brand building/maintenance which is why there are all those Daz  and Guinness ads on TV - a medium which is increasingly under threat along with mainstream media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the traditional view of marketing, advertising plays a large part. The problem is that it has been proven to be a broken model if it is for lead generation purposes. It&#8217;s fine for brand building/maintenance which is why there are all those Daz  and Guinness ads on TV &#8211; a medium which is increasingly under threat along with mainstream media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

