<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On meeting Phil Hodgen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/on-meeting-phil-hodgen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/on-meeting-phil-hodgen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/on-meeting-phil-hodgen/comment-page-1/#comment-4618</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/on-meeting-phil-hodgen/#comment-4618</guid>
		<description>Excellent points Philip and which speak to the issue of change but ones that are increasingly being accommodated in the newer forms of software. My sense is that once people get familiar with things like RSS in IE7 then I think we&#039;ll see a mass shift - that&#039;s maybe a year out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points Philip and which speak to the issue of change but ones that are increasingly being accommodated in the newer forms of software. My sense is that once people get familiar with things like RSS in IE7 then I think we&#8217;ll see a mass shift &#8211; that&#8217;s maybe a year out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Hodgen</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/on-meeting-phil-hodgen/comment-page-1/#comment-4617</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Hodgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/on-meeting-phil-hodgen/#comment-4617</guid>
		<description>Actually I think I have identified the essential element I need for collaboration software.  (I&#039;m talking of project-driven business transactions, where all of the project communication and documents are centralized and shared among people inside and outside of my business).

Normal people live inside email to communicate with each other.  For better or worse, I deal day-to-day with normal people, and not the people who have Twitter accounts and a blog.

The software tool has to adapt to the way people are, rather than the way they should interact with each other if they knew what was good for them.

In my experiments with internal collaborative software as well as software to work with the outside world (OK, an extranet, if you must), I have noticed that if you don&#039;t pander to people&#039;s basic familiarity with email and their intrinsic fear of the new, you&#039;re going to fail.  People just won&#039;t use the tool presented to them.

This is one reason I pitched BaseCamp to the wolves, although there are several other reasons as well.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think I have identified the essential element I need for collaboration software.  (I&#8217;m talking of project-driven business transactions, where all of the project communication and documents are centralized and shared among people inside and outside of my business).</p>
<p>Normal people live inside email to communicate with each other.  For better or worse, I deal day-to-day with normal people, and not the people who have Twitter accounts and a blog.</p>
<p>The software tool has to adapt to the way people are, rather than the way they should interact with each other if they knew what was good for them.</p>
<p>In my experiments with internal collaborative software as well as software to work with the outside world (OK, an extranet, if you must), I have noticed that if you don&#8217;t pander to people&#8217;s basic familiarity with email and their intrinsic fear of the new, you&#8217;re going to fail.  People just won&#8217;t use the tool presented to them.</p>
<p>This is one reason I pitched BaseCamp to the wolves, although there are several other reasons as well.  <img src='http://www.accmanpro.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Hodgen</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/on-meeting-phil-hodgen/comment-page-1/#comment-4616</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Hodgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/03/17/on-meeting-phil-hodgen/#comment-4616</guid>
		<description>Dennis,

It was a treat that you and I happened to be in San Francisco at the same time.  I&#039;m glad we could meet for a cup of coffee.

I deeply resent the intrusion of inflexible software in my business (&quot;No,&quot; says the software vendor, &quot;you will run your life the way our software is written and you will LIKE IT!&quot;) so hearing from you was invigorating.

The message I got from you?  (1) There IS software outside the legal-specific vertical market.  (2) I will have to put up with a bit of systems complexity in my life, small-pieces-loosely-joined notwithstanding.

I&#039;m keeping my eyes open and will look at Wordframe.  I can&#039;t believe that 4 people (that&#039;s our full-time staff here) need TWO f-ing servers.  Yet that&#039;s what we have.  I don&#039;t want to live in that world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>It was a treat that you and I happened to be in San Francisco at the same time.  I&#8217;m glad we could meet for a cup of coffee.</p>
<p>I deeply resent the intrusion of inflexible software in my business (&#8220;No,&#8221; says the software vendor, &#8220;you will run your life the way our software is written and you will LIKE IT!&#8221;) so hearing from you was invigorating.</p>
<p>The message I got from you?  (1) There IS software outside the legal-specific vertical market.  (2) I will have to put up with a bit of systems complexity in my life, small-pieces-loosely-joined notwithstanding.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m keeping my eyes open and will look at Wordframe.  I can&#8217;t believe that 4 people (that&#8217;s our full-time staff here) need TWO f-ing servers.  Yet that&#8217;s what we have.  I don&#8217;t want to live in that world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

