The next big thing – digestion
Over the last couple of weeks it seems there has been a dearth of ‘new’ or rather interesting things to comment upon. Perhaps we’re in that period that Jeff Nolan describes as ‘the new incrementalism’ where:
As I survey the landscape of consumer and business focused software and service providers I am struck by how much incrementalism there is at the moment. Something like Twitter is ground breaking in terms of break out adoption, but what about the other 10,000 startups? There are few bold “ah-hah” ideas, lot’s of social this or that, and mostly a bunch of companies hoping to draft on the perceived success of a few gorillas. Will we suffer through yet another “year of the mobile web” or “the semantic web”?
More likely at least some of us are stuck in a Twitterverse where instant conversation means more than considered blog post reading. Jeff’s point is well made but then I think Vinnie Mirchandani is nearer the mark when he adds:
As I have said many times, there is no magic "innovation" IT budget. You have to show the CIO and business executives ways to chisel existing spend to justify budgets for your cool stuff.
The same is true for professionals. In one sense UK buyers are fortunate. We can watch from afar as money is poured into startups in the US and observe as the me-toos pile up against one another in the vain hope that one or other will gather traction while awaiting the inevitable 90%+ fallout.
But while both Jeff and Vinnie’s arguments fit well with the enterprise world I sense we’re in a period of digestion. The arguments around whether saas/on-demand is the next big thing – at least from a professional standpoint – have yet to sink in though I see plenty of signs that we’ve moved beyond the ‘curious interest’ stage to one of at least dabbling.
Jeff talks about FriendFeed but when taken together with that other service du jour Twitter, they merely represent features of a much broader alternative to existing methods of communication and collaboration. They can easily be replicated, extended and taken to a new place where value is obvious rather than implied. Who’s doing that I wonder? I’ve seen signs at places like HiveLive but the technology needs to deliver something meaningful and so far we only have glimpses. Bring on the case studies that all can understand.
I’m with Jeff when he says we live with the curse of Web 2.0 as somehow representing a blurring of the lines between business and consumer. But I’m far from convinced that we have seen what this means for developers building for business.
We may be short of head turning innovations that make us go ‘wow’ but then incremental isn’t bad. Evolution rather than revolution has, after all, seemed more comfortable.








Nice piece D, although I wouldn’t agree with “dearth of new/interesting things” maybe you are not tuning into to the right channels.
I would definitely concur with yours and Vinnie’s Digestive phas. I think both vendors and enterprises themselves will look at the emerging web 2.0 winning features and integrate them.
I guess the question is how, will the old school vendors win (sharepoint hell!) or will the enterprises really take the wholesale reinvention (edge engineering) of I.T. seriously. Will the enterprises embrace the bigger organisational changes along with the new tech ideas?
Personally I think we are ways away from that and it will takes some newer business upstarts showing the current enterprises how to dance to the new tunes.
I also think enterprise vendorship will also change with the advent of players like Amazon, Google and others entering their sacred ground.
regards
Al
Reply