<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Encyclopaedia Britannica online goes sort of free</title> <atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/04/19/encyclopaedia-britannica-online-goes-sort-of-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/04/19/encyclopaedia-britannica-online-goes-sort-of-free/</link> <description>never knowingly under opinionated</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:02:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Encyclopaedia Britannica goes social : NevilleHobson.com</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/04/19/encyclopaedia-britannica-online-goes-sort-of-free/comment-page-1/#comment-185139</link> <dc:creator>Encyclopaedia Britannica goes social : NevilleHobson.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:30:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3008#comment-185139</guid> <description>[...] Dennis Howlett&#8217;s post yesterday has this opinion: [&#8230;] People pay for scarcity and while you can argue that Wikipedia trumps Britannica because of the cost element, I know which I prefer to use as a primary research tool. Britannica will develop an alternative business model that allows it to attract revenue but quite how that shapes up remains to be seen. If it chooses to drop its annual charge for full access, then it could develop deeper resources paid for on an ‘as required’ basis. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dennis Howlett&#8217;s post yesterday has this opinion: [&#8230;] People pay for scarcity and while you can argue that Wikipedia trumps Britannica because of the cost element, I know which I prefer to use as a primary research tool. Britannica will develop an alternative business model that allows it to attract revenue but quite how that shapes up remains to be seen. If it chooses to drop its annual charge for full access, then it could develop deeper resources paid for on an ‘as required’ basis. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kunal Sen</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/04/19/encyclopaedia-britannica-online-goes-sort-of-free/comment-page-1/#comment-184994</link> <dc:creator>Kunal Sen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:30:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3008#comment-184994</guid> <description>Dennis, EB is actually indexed by all search engines for many years. However, since parts of the site is only available to subscribers, one may not be able to get to everything. Also, EB articles don&#039;t always rank as high as Wikipedia, but an individual can solve that by subscribing to Google&#039;s Subscribed Link program (http://www.google.com/coop/subscribedlinks/directory/All_categories?start=10).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, EB is actually indexed by all search engines for many years. However, since parts of the site is only available to subscribers, one may not be able to get to everything. Also, EB articles don&#8217;t always rank as high as Wikipedia, but an individual can solve that by subscribing to Google&#8217;s Subscribed Link program (<a
href="http://www.google.com/coop/subscribedlinks/directory/All_categories?start=10" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/coop/subscribedlinks/directory/All_categories?start=10</a>).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dennis Howlett</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/04/19/encyclopaedia-britannica-online-goes-sort-of-free/comment-page-1/#comment-184915</link> <dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:57:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3008#comment-184915</guid> <description>yes it is - on purpose</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes it is &#8211; on purpose</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom Raftery</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/04/19/encyclopaedia-britannica-online-goes-sort-of-free/comment-page-1/#comment-184904</link> <dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:59:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3008#comment-184904</guid> <description>Dennis,your blog is only publishing partial feeds.I hope this is not on purpose.Tom</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p><p>your blog is only publishing partial feeds.</p><p>I hope this is not on purpose.</p><p>Tom</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/24 queries in 0.177 seconds using disk

Served from: www.accmanpro.com @ 2010-03-19 13:00:08 -->