<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: SAP Business ByDesign delayed</title> <atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/05/01/sap-business-bydesign-delayed-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/05/01/sap-business-bydesign-delayed-2/</link> <description>never knowingly under opinionated</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:09:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: SAP Tutorial</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/05/01/sap-business-bydesign-delayed-2/comment-page-1/#comment-399872</link> <dc:creator>SAP Tutorial</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:28:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3033#comment-399872</guid> <description>Oh Thanks for updating this SAP new. It&#039;s very useful&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mysapsd.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.mysapsd.com&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Thanks for updating this SAP new. It&#39;s very useful</p><p>Regards,</p><p><a
href="http://www.mysapsd.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysapsd.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dennis Howlett</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/05/01/sap-business-bydesign-delayed-2/comment-page-1/#comment-186401</link> <dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:23:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3033#comment-186401</guid> <description>The UI should not be an issue. They said last year it can be changed within 30 days. It&#039;s a separate layer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UI should not be an issue. They said last year it can be changed within 30 days. It&#8217;s a separate layer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul Wallis</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/05/01/sap-business-bydesign-delayed-2/comment-page-1/#comment-186386</link> <dc:creator>Paul Wallis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:26:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3033#comment-186386</guid> <description>Dennis,I wonder if they are having trouble with the user interface?Last November in a post called “Enterprise Applications and User Interfaces”, I wrote that:&quot;There are changes afoot in the way enterprise applications are sold.  Enterprise applications get so ingrained within a business that changing to a competitor is a very unpalatable proposition.  So in order to find new markets enterprise software vendors are seeing that by changing their message slightly and using newer technologies, they can move away from the big, clumsy monolithic applications of old and start appealing to Small and Medium size businesses – essential if they are to expand their client base.  New business from new market sectors.This forces a change in price point.  And that changes the sale more towards the high volume, low cost software application sector.  And that forces a change in user interface.  The most high profile changes we’ve seen have come with SAP and Oracle. &quot;  For more visit, http://www.keystonesandrivets.com/kar/2007/11/enterprise-appl.htmlIt may be that that the time and cost of making SAP more user-friendly and flexible is making them think again about the whole project.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p><p>I wonder if they are having trouble with the user interface?</p><p>Last November in a post called “Enterprise Applications and User Interfaces”, I wrote that:</p><p> &#8220;There are changes afoot in the way enterprise applications are sold.  Enterprise applications get so ingrained within a business that changing to a competitor is a very unpalatable proposition.  So in order to find new markets enterprise software vendors are seeing that by changing their message slightly and using newer technologies, they can move away from the big, clumsy monolithic applications of old and start appealing to Small and Medium size businesses – essential if they are to expand their client base.  New business from new market sectors.</p><p>This forces a change in price point.  And that changes the sale more towards the high volume, low cost software application sector.  And that forces a change in user interface.  The most high profile changes we’ve seen have come with SAP and Oracle. &#8221;  For more visit, <a
href="http://www.keystonesandrivets.com/kar/2007/11/enterprise-appl.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.keystonesandrivets.com/kar/2007/11/enterprise-appl.html</a></p><p>It may be that that the time and cost of making SAP more user-friendly and flexible is making them think again about the whole project.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/23 queries in 0.108 seconds using disk

Served from: www.accmanpro.com @ 2010-03-09 22:16:48 -->