<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: IT Counts opens up&#8230;well sort of</title> <atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/09/25/it-counts-opens-upwell-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/09/25/it-counts-opens-upwell-sort-of/</link> <description>never knowingly under opinionated</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Stuart G Hall</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/09/25/it-counts-opens-upwell-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-383569</link> <dc:creator>Stuart G Hall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:39:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3354#comment-383569</guid> <description>Interesting post, thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hugh Scantlebury</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/09/25/it-counts-opens-upwell-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-264122</link> <dc:creator>Hugh Scantlebury</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:58:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3354#comment-264122</guid> <description>I have to say I agree with Dennis on this one. One of the hub sites I am involved with initially used registration as a basis for contribution. Consequently numbers were small and we had a number of unwelcome spammer types pitch up to promote their &quot;wares&quot; , most of which were not of any interest to our readership.Subsequently we have moved to moderated postings and it all seems to work so much better (albeit a number of folk have to be available to screen material - but hen no one said Editors would disappear in a Web 2.0 world did they?)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I agree with Dennis on this one. One of the hub sites I am involved with initially used registration as a basis for contribution. Consequently numbers were small and we had a number of unwelcome spammer types pitch up to promote their &#8220;wares&#8221; , most of which were not of any interest to our readership.</p><p>Subsequently we have moved to moderated postings and it all seems to work so much better (albeit a number of folk have to be available to screen material &#8211; but hen no one said Editors would disappear in a Web 2.0 world did they?)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/22 queries in 0.064 seconds using disk

Served from: www.accmanpro.com @ 2010-03-11 03:41:38 -->