<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IT Counts opens up&#8230;well sort of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/09/25/it-counts-opens-upwell-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/09/25/it-counts-opens-upwell-sort-of/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart G Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/09/25/it-counts-opens-upwell-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-5134</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart G Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3354#comment-5134</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Scantlebury</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/09/25/it-counts-opens-upwell-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-5133</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Scantlebury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3354#comment-5133</guid>
		<description>I have to say I agree with Dennis on this one. One of the hub sites I am involved with initially used registration as a basis for contribution. Consequently numbers were small and we had a number of unwelcome spammer types pitch up to promote their &quot;wares&quot; , most of which were not of any interest to our readership.

Subsequently we have moved to moderated postings and it all seems to work so much better (albeit a number of folk have to be available to screen material - but hen no one said Editors would disappear in a Web 2.0 world did they?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I agree with Dennis on this one. One of the hub sites I am involved with initially used registration as a basis for contribution. Consequently numbers were small and we had a number of unwelcome spammer types pitch up to promote their &#8220;wares&#8221; , most of which were not of any interest to our readership.</p>
<p>Subsequently we have moved to moderated postings and it all seems to work so much better (albeit a number of folk have to be available to screen material &#8211; but hen no one said Editors would disappear in a Web 2.0 world did they?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

