<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is saas too expensive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-5166</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3408#comment-5166</guid>
		<description>Someone else asked me that but it is not something I discuss publicly because it relates to IP I own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone else asked me that but it is not something I discuss publicly because it relates to IP I own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Y</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-5165</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3408#comment-5165</guid>
		<description>Dennis, could you expand on this subject please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, could you expand on this subject please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-5164</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3408#comment-5164</guid>
		<description>@Ali: If the only thing that clients want to do is keep books then fine. But that isn&#039;t the way I see it. Keeping the books just isn&#039;t enough in this day and age and especially now that we&#039;ve entered a recession where cash is king. Tell me how your book-keeping is going to help with that problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ali: If the only thing that clients want to do is keep books then fine. But that isn&#039;t the way I see it. Keeping the books just isn&#039;t enough in this day and age and especially now that we&#039;ve entered a recession where cash is king. Tell me how your book-keeping is going to help with that problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Choudhury</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-5163</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Choudhury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3408#comment-5163</guid>
		<description>Sage Instant is about £100 which is about five to eight months worth of  &quot;rent&quot; for a decent online accounting service. There&#039;s no need to upgrade ; I know clients who still use v7. Saas is probably more applicable to businesses turning over in the millions who need more powerful software and support but would rather not pay for feature-bloat or the extra head-count to manage and trouble-shoot things on a daily basis.

Clients wanting to do their own books, and who dislike Sage\Quickbooks, I&#039;d turn towards VT Transaction. It&#039;s easily the best-kept secret in the UK accounting software market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sage Instant is about £100 which is about five to eight months worth of  &#8220;rent&#8221; for a decent online accounting service. There&#8217;s no need to upgrade ; I know clients who still use v7. Saas is probably more applicable to businesses turning over in the millions who need more powerful software and support but would rather not pay for feature-bloat or the extra head-count to manage and trouble-shoot things on a daily basis.</p>
<p>Clients wanting to do their own books, and who dislike Sage\Quickbooks, I&#8217;d turn towards VT Transaction. It&#8217;s easily the best-kept secret in the UK accounting software market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-5162</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3408#comment-5162</guid>
		<description>@Nigel - no idea. I presume they&#039;d continue to add features at no cost

@Mr WS - and they enjoy continuing to pay for product that is supposed to be enhanced but is lucky to see significant development more than once a year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nigel &#8211; no idea. I presume they&#8217;d continue to add features at no cost</p>
<p>@Mr WS &#8211; and they enjoy continuing to pay for product that is supposed to be enhanced but is lucky to see significant development more than once a year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Web Service</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-5161</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Web Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3408#comment-5161</guid>
		<description>Surely the main problem is just that people inherently don&#039;t like renting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the main problem is just that people inherently don&#8217;t like renting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel James</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-5160</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3408#comment-5160</guid>
		<description>So when is FreeagentCentral announcing they are reducing their prices?


Nigel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when is FreeagentCentral announcing they are reducing their prices?</p>
<p>Nigel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bristol</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-5159</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bristol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3408#comment-5159</guid>
		<description>Speaking for Less Accounting I think there is a perspective that hasn&#039;t been mentioned. Our users are small business owners and freelancers who do their own books. We wrote Less Accounting to be easy (perhaps even joyful) to use. That is worth paying for. Even if Intuit gave Quickbooks away for free, people would still pay for Less Accounting because it saves them time and frustration. And that has a value. People pay a premium for Apple&#039;s OS X because it is less frustrating, people who know the value of their time and and energy save money by paying for software like OS X or Less Accounting. These people are a growing, virtually untapped market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking for Less Accounting I think there is a perspective that hasn&#039;t been mentioned. Our users are small business owners and freelancers who do their own books. We wrote Less Accounting to be easy (perhaps even joyful) to use. That is worth paying for. Even if Intuit gave Quickbooks away for free, people would still pay for Less Accounting because it saves them time and frustration. And that has a value. People pay a premium for Apple&#039;s OS X because it is less frustrating, people who know the value of their time and and energy save money by paying for software like OS X or Less Accounting. These people are a growing, virtually untapped market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-5158</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 07:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3408#comment-5158</guid>
		<description>Pay per use only works in certain scenarios. For core business processes, it is very hard to come up with a model and make it viable to both users and vendors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay per use only works in certain scenarios. For core business processes, it is very hard to come up with a model and make it viable to both users and vendors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Web Service</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/10/06/is-saas-too-expensive/comment-page-1/#comment-5157</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Web Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 07:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3408#comment-5157</guid>
		<description>Transparent pay-per-use pricing models such as those employed by Postcode Anywhere and TheWebService.com seem to fit the nicely IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transparent pay-per-use pricing models such as those employed by Postcode Anywhere and TheWebService.com seem to fit the nicely IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

