You are here: Home » General » Is FASB brain dead?

Is FASB brain dead?

by Dennis Howlett on November 6, 2008

CFO.com reports that:

Without fully suspending fair value accounting to help banks weather the credit crisis, regulators and standard setters are now making it clear that financial institutions can avoid the so-called mark-to-market methodology — at least some of the time.

The latest clarification released by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Accounting Standards Board points out that banks that issue stock warrants to the government, as part of the Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program, will not have to value the warrants using fair value accounting. As a result, banks won’t have to absorb potential losses if the market value of the instruments decline.

I am lost for words to describe just how asinine this measure really is. Might as well just shove them on the balance sheet as permanent capital. Nobody is going to care-  are they?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark
  • Emily,

    Let me give you a few:
    * Prior history of ability to innovate
    * Ability to leverage knowledge throughout the organization
    * Pricing policies
    * Gut feel

    No very scientific, but business is art not science.
  • Emily Coltman
    Balance sheet / income statement / cash flow statement = three blind mice?

    That's good that.

    Ed, may I bat this one back at you and ask, what would you recommend we should be making financial / investment decisions based on?

    M
  • FASB is dead already as is GAAP! If anyone is making financial/investment decisions based on the three blind mice (balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement) they are idiots anyway.

    I once had a customer who owner hundreds of acres in Queens County (NYC), New York. Their land was on the books at the 1850's price of $1,500. What a joke!

    IMHO, the mark-to-market valuation caused some of the "problem" recently. Some MBS (mortgage backed securities) were being "valued" at .20 on the dollar. This would mean that four of five mortgages would have to a) default and b) have zero recovery value. Please! I would pay .50 on the dollar for as many as I could get.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: