<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The politics of accounting and bank failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad boys, old boys, new thinking &#124; AccMan</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-5478</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad boys, old boys, new thinking &#124; AccMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3787#comment-5478</guid>
		<description>[...] The politics of accounting and bank failure (accmanpro.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The politics of accounting and bank failure (accmanpro.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alastair</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-5477</link>
		<dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3787#comment-5477</guid>
		<description>Richard, accounting is rarely political, but it is appropriate that politicians take an interest in accounting standards, just as it is appropriate that other users of accounts take such an interest.  However, I think the law is correct, in that it requires that accounts should comply with accounting standards.  I am no fan of the IASB or the UK equivalent - personally I think the current crop of standards are far to overworked, and unfortunately beyond the ken of most users of accounts,  but I do think it appropriate that accounting standards are produced by a body who understands what they are talking about.

I think Dennis&#039;s piece highlights nicely one of the problems when politicians tinker.  The questions to answer is what is the appropriate balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, accounting is rarely political, but it is appropriate that politicians take an interest in accounting standards, just as it is appropriate that other users of accounts take such an interest.  However, I think the law is correct, in that it requires that accounts should comply with accounting standards.  I am no fan of the IASB or the UK equivalent &#8211; personally I think the current crop of standards are far to overworked, and unfortunately beyond the ken of most users of accounts,  but I do think it appropriate that accounting standards are produced by a body who understands what they are talking about.</p>
<p>I think Dennis&#039;s piece highlights nicely one of the problems when politicians tinker.  The questions to answer is what is the appropriate balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who knows, who cares? &#124; AccMan</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-5476</link>
		<dc:creator>Who knows, who cares? &#124; AccMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3787#comment-5476</guid>
		<description>[...] have a pivotal role to play in guiding business. But&#8230;the profession has to change. Allowing itself to be bulldozed is not a great starting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have a pivotal role to play in guiding business. But&#8230;the profession has to change. Allowing itself to be bulldozed is not a great starting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just who the heck is running the profession? &#124; called2account</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-5475</link>
		<dc:creator>Just who the heck is running the profession? &#124; called2account</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 05:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3787#comment-5475</guid>
		<description>[...] Dennis Howlett has asked: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dennis Howlett has asked: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / Just who the heck is running the profession?</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-5474</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / Just who the heck is running the profession?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3787#comment-5474</guid>
		<description>[...] Dennis Howlett has asked: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dennis Howlett has asked: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who&#8217;s Winning The Fair Value Debate - Might Makes Right &#124; called2account</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-5473</link>
		<dc:creator>Who&#8217;s Winning The Fair Value Debate - Might Makes Right &#124; called2account</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3787#comment-5473</guid>
		<description>[...] lax regulatory oversight of folks who were fleecing even sophisticated investors of billions.Â   Dennis HowlettÂ takes a jabbing stab this morning at explaining how bad it really is here in the US: &#8220;If the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lax regulatory oversight of folks who were fleecing even sophisticated investors of billions.Â   Dennis HowlettÂ takes a jabbing stab this morning at explaining how bad it really is here in the US: &#8220;If the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-5472</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3787#comment-5472</guid>
		<description>Alastair

Accounting is political

Accounting exists because law requires it

Accounting standards are part of law

Why should they be beyond democratic control?

What&#039;s your proposal? Dictatorship of accountants?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Richard Murphy&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alastair</p>
<p>Accounting is political</p>
<p>Accounting exists because law requires it</p>
<p>Accounting standards are part of law</p>
<p>Why should they be beyond democratic control?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your proposal? Dictatorship of accountants?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/blog/" rel="nofollow">Richard Murphy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK / An accountant&#8217;s duty</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-5471</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK / An accountant&#8217;s duty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3787#comment-5471</guid>
		<description>[...] is what accountants have done for far too long. They have sought, as Dennis Howlett has discussed elsewhere in the last day or so, to live by the rules. That&#8217;s not good enough. In fact it is a recipe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is what accountants have done for far too long. They have sought, as Dennis Howlett has discussed elsewhere in the last day or so, to live by the rules. That&#8217;s not good enough. In fact it is a recipe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-5470</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3787#comment-5470</guid>
		<description>Dennis -

Mark-to-market has put many financial firms into a death spiral. They have to write down assets, which causes them to sell assets at distressed prices to maintain capital levels, which causes some of their remaining assets to decrease further in value, which causes them to sell. . .

The market for many securities evaporated, making it nearly impossible to figure out the value of the assets. (We have a similar problem trying to figure out real estate asset value.) With a poorly functioning market you leave it up to the CFOs to come up with a number out of thin air.

On the the other hand, this lack of transparency of asset value helped caused the market to fail. Nobody trusted that truthfulness of a counterparty&#039;s balance sheet.

Perhaps the new U.S. administration can help get the regulators and enforcement bodies back on track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis -</p>
<p>Mark-to-market has put many financial firms into a death spiral. They have to write down assets, which causes them to sell assets at distressed prices to maintain capital levels, which causes some of their remaining assets to decrease further in value, which causes them to sell. . .</p>
<p>The market for many securities evaporated, making it nearly impossible to figure out the value of the assets. (We have a similar problem trying to figure out real estate asset value.) With a poorly functioning market you leave it up to the CFOs to come up with a number out of thin air.</p>
<p>On the the other hand, this lack of transparency of asset value helped caused the market to fail. Nobody trusted that truthfulness of a counterparty&#039;s balance sheet.</p>
<p>Perhaps the new U.S. administration can help get the regulators and enforcement bodies back on track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alastair</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2008/12/29/the-politics-of-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-5469</link>
		<dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3787#comment-5469</guid>
		<description>Dennis, are you really suggesting it is wrong that politics should be able to influence accounting standards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, are you really suggesting it is wrong that politics should be able to influence accounting standards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

