<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Innovation in billing: the lawyers are eating our lunch</title> <atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/08/innovation-in-billing-the-lawyers-are-eating-our-lunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/08/innovation-in-billing-the-lawyers-are-eating-our-lunch/</link> <description>never knowingly under opinionated</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: 10 dis-commandments for making money &#171; RetailSmart</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/08/innovation-in-billing-the-lawyers-are-eating-our-lunch/comment-page-1/#comment-370814</link> <dc:creator>10 dis-commandments for making money &#171; RetailSmart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:18:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3817#comment-370814</guid> <description>[...] Innovation in billing: the lawyers are eating our lunch (accmanpro.com) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Innovation in billing: the lawyers are eating our lunch (accmanpro.com) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Cornelius</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/08/innovation-in-billing-the-lawyers-are-eating-our-lunch/comment-page-1/#comment-310358</link> <dc:creator>Doug Cornelius</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:00:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3817#comment-310358</guid> <description>Dennis -Don&#039;t get fooled into thinking lawyers are leading the way. It&#039;s a lot of puffery. Morgan Lewis is trying to alleviate associate concerns and help with recruiting. (I would guess that many associates failed to hit the 2000 hr mark and probably will also next year.)Clients and lawyers have been complaining about the billable for decades. They have also been predicting its demise for decades. As mark Twain said: &quot;the reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis -</p><p>Don&#8217;t get fooled into thinking lawyers are leading the way. It&#8217;s a lot of puffery. Morgan Lewis is trying to alleviate associate concerns and help with recruiting. (I would guess that many associates failed to hit the 2000 hr mark and probably will also next year.)</p><p>Clients and lawyers have been complaining about the billable for decades. They have also been predicting its demise for decades. As mark Twain said: &#8220;the reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed Kless</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/08/innovation-in-billing-the-lawyers-are-eating-our-lunch/comment-page-1/#comment-309985</link> <dc:creator>Ed Kless</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:02:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3817#comment-309985</guid> <description>Dennis, don&#039;t you worry, there are still dinosaurs our there. Witness this exchange with David Giacalone --&gt; http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/25/smart-clients-care-about-bonuses-and-marketplace-value/Die Billable Hour DIE!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, don&#8217;t you worry, there are still dinosaurs our there. Witness this exchange with David Giacalone &#8211;&gt; <a
href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/25/smart-clients-care-about-bonuses-and-marketplace-value/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/25/smart-clients-care-about-bonuses-and-marketplace-value/</a></p><p>Die Billable Hour DIE!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dennis Howlett</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/08/innovation-in-billing-the-lawyers-are-eating-our-lunch/comment-page-1/#comment-309966</link> <dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:29:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3817#comment-309966</guid> <description>That&#039;s really encouraging Michael. I&#039;ll post this on ICAEW site as well - hopefully tomorrow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really encouraging Michael. I&#8217;ll post this on ICAEW site as well &#8211; hopefully tomorrow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Kridel</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/08/innovation-in-billing-the-lawyers-are-eating-our-lunch/comment-page-1/#comment-309959</link> <dc:creator>Michael Kridel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:22:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3817#comment-309959</guid> <description>We&#039;re a 100+ person, three office local CPA firm in South Florida. We have been moving into, and now primarily using, fixed fee engagement letters with fluid change orders for most, if not all, in our Tax/Wealth and Small Business Services groups. Audit typically has a fixed fee engagement, as does Business Valuation. My group, Litigation, never has fixed fees. It is too hard to guess in this type of work.We have found increasing acceptance of these new engagement terms, particularly in this economy. We&#039;ve also found that it is much easier to get a client to pay for an agreed upon change order than bill them higher amounts later, especially as we are moving more and more into COD deliverables.My partners are very happy with the results, though as a traditional practitioner for 35 years, I still have a hard time getting the term &quot;change order&quot; out of my mouth without thinking about the last house I purchased.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re a 100+ person, three office local CPA firm in South Florida. We have been moving into, and now primarily using, fixed fee engagement letters with fluid change orders for most, if not all, in our Tax/Wealth and Small Business Services groups. Audit typically has a fixed fee engagement, as does Business Valuation. My group, Litigation, never has fixed fees. It is too hard to guess in this type of work.</p><p>We have found increasing acceptance of these new engagement terms, particularly in this economy. We&#8217;ve also found that it is much easier to get a client to pay for an agreed upon change order than bill them higher amounts later, especially as we are moving more and more into COD deliverables.</p><p>My partners are very happy with the results, though as a traditional practitioner for 35 years, I still have a hard time getting the term &#8220;change order&#8221; out of my mouth without thinking about the last house I purchased.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/25 queries in 0.170 seconds using disk

Served from: www.accmanpro.com @ 2010-03-12 22:38:55 -->