<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Give us a Twhirl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/24/give-us-a-twhirl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/24/give-us-a-twhirl/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennnis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/24/give-us-a-twhirl/comment-page-1/#comment-5613</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennnis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3880#comment-5613</guid>
		<description>@andrew: that&#039;s why a bunch of us are working on ESME - secure form of Twitter for serious people like thee and me. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@andrew: that&#039;s why a bunch of us are working on ESME &#8211; secure form of Twitter for serious people like thee and me. <img src='http://www.accmanpro.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krupo</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/24/give-us-a-twhirl/comment-page-1/#comment-5612</link>
		<dc:creator>Krupo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3880#comment-5612</guid>
		<description>I guess I don&#039;t value connectivity as highly as you.

After the recent twitter security breach, my wariness level hasn&#039;t decreased! :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I don&#039;t value connectivity as highly as you.</p>
<p>After the recent twitter security breach, my wariness level hasn&#039;t decreased! :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jr</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/24/give-us-a-twhirl/comment-page-1/#comment-5611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3880#comment-5611</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been a loyal Twhirl user for months after maintaining multiple Twitter accounts became too much of a pain via the web. While everyone else seemed to be evangelizing Tweetdeck, reviews made it seem as if it would facilitate a full-on Twitter addiction (I needed a tool that made Twitter as useful as possible without making it so easy to get engulfed in the site that I forgot about other useful modes of communication and connection), so I passed. Twhirl accomplished what I wanted. After a tiny honeymoon period, of course.

As for being able to update across multiple sites, call me old fashioned but I am still reluctant to tie together Facebook, Twitter, blog, etc to the point where updating is nearly automatic. There is too much of an overlap and I hate to automatically inundate my connections with the same information. Each site has its own set of connections, and its own individual purpose, at least to me. I&#039;d like to keep it that way.

But good for Twhirl. I&#039;m glad to see they might just overtake Tweetdeck after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been a loyal Twhirl user for months after maintaining multiple Twitter accounts became too much of a pain via the web. While everyone else seemed to be evangelizing Tweetdeck, reviews made it seem as if it would facilitate a full-on Twitter addiction (I needed a tool that made Twitter as useful as possible without making it so easy to get engulfed in the site that I forgot about other useful modes of communication and connection), so I passed. Twhirl accomplished what I wanted. After a tiny honeymoon period, of course.</p>
<p>As for being able to update across multiple sites, call me old fashioned but I am still reluctant to tie together Facebook, Twitter, blog, etc to the point where updating is nearly automatic. There is too much of an overlap and I hate to automatically inundate my connections with the same information. Each site has its own set of connections, and its own individual purpose, at least to me. I&#039;d like to keep it that way.</p>
<p>But good for Twhirl. I&#039;m glad to see they might just overtake Tweetdeck after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/24/give-us-a-twhirl/comment-page-1/#comment-5610</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 07:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3880#comment-5610</guid>
		<description>Andrew - think logically. You sign up to gazzillions of services, all of which want a y/n and p/w. Sharing them among those same services isn&#039;t a big deal if it gives me connectivity. Is it? If so then how do expect that global systems are going to interoperate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew &#8211; think logically. You sign up to gazzillions of services, all of which want a y/n and p/w. Sharing them among those same services isn&#039;t a big deal if it gives me connectivity. Is it? If so then how do expect that global systems are going to interoperate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krupo</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/24/give-us-a-twhirl/comment-page-1/#comment-5609</link>
		<dc:creator>Krupo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 07:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3880#comment-5609</guid>
		<description>If that&#039;s what they have set-up, not so bad.

I refer to the sites that want your password and login ID to every single service you use - pass!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#039;s what they have set-up, not so bad.</p>
<p>I refer to the sites that want your password and login ID to every single service you use &#8211; pass!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/24/give-us-a-twhirl/comment-page-1/#comment-5608</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 06:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3880#comment-5608</guid>
		<description>Why - that&#039;s what open APIs are all about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why &#8211; that&#039;s what open APIs are all about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krupo</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/24/give-us-a-twhirl/comment-page-1/#comment-5607</link>
		<dc:creator>Krupo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3880#comment-5607</guid>
		<description>Only problem is I&#039;m still deeply suspicious of services that want my login credentials to multiple services... :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only problem is I&#039;m still deeply suspicious of services that want my login credentials to multiple services&#8230; :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Baumann</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/24/give-us-a-twhirl/comment-page-1/#comment-5606</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Baumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 02:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3880#comment-5606</guid>
		<description>Twhirl was the first client that helped ensnare me into Twitter. Then TweetDeck came out to offer grouping, which helped focus on main followers. Until today, I thought TweeDeck was headed toward the finals in the desktop client race.

If Twhirl adds a few more functions (like groups), I may return to it as my primary interface. TweetDeck&#039;s move I guess.

++++

re: Mark Lee&#039;s thoughts: As long as anybody takes Twitter seriously, they will never get anything out of it. It&#039;s like being serious about telephony. Once you realize what a stupid, absurd and inane contraption it is, you&#039;ll then see that tiny sliver of utility: that utility is different from person to person imho.

Final remark: I can think of many ways for Accountants to use Twitter (in fact, I can think of thousands of ways accountants could violate SEC laws - but I don&#039;t think that should discourage its use). I&#039;d love to see more accountants on Twitter (not just public ones, but all the other varieties). Twitter&#039;s as useful and useless as the peeps tweeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twhirl was the first client that helped ensnare me into Twitter. Then TweetDeck came out to offer grouping, which helped focus on main followers. Until today, I thought TweeDeck was headed toward the finals in the desktop client race.</p>
<p>If Twhirl adds a few more functions (like groups), I may return to it as my primary interface. TweetDeck&#039;s move I guess.</p>
<p>++++</p>
<p>re: Mark Lee&#039;s thoughts: As long as anybody takes Twitter seriously, they will never get anything out of it. It&#039;s like being serious about telephony. Once you realize what a stupid, absurd and inane contraption it is, you&#039;ll then see that tiny sliver of utility: that utility is different from person to person imho.</p>
<p>Final remark: I can think of many ways for Accountants to use Twitter (in fact, I can think of thousands of ways accountants could violate SEC laws &#8211; but I don&#039;t think that should discourage its use). I&#039;d love to see more accountants on Twitter (not just public ones, but all the other varieties). Twitter&#039;s as useful and useless as the peeps tweeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

