Comments on: Pricewaterhouse finally acts on Satyam http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/27/pricewaterhouse-finally-acts-on-satyam/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: remove Best Malware Protection http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/27/pricewaterhouse-finally-acts-on-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-5629 remove Best Malware Protection Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:17:00 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3897#comment-5629 That's cool. That’s cool.

]]> By: remove Best Malware Protection http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/27/pricewaterhouse-finally-acts-on-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-10670 remove Best Malware Protection Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:17:00 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3897#comment-10670 That's cool. That’s cool.

]]> By: Woodworking project plans http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/27/pricewaterhouse-finally-acts-on-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-5628 Woodworking project plans Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:11:54 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3897#comment-5628 The partners concerned are accused of major crimes and should have been suspended the moment they were taken into custody. The partners concerned are accused of major crimes and should have been suspended the moment they were taken into custody.

]]> By: Woodworking project plans http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/27/pricewaterhouse-finally-acts-on-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-10280 Woodworking project plans Thu, 16 Sep 2010 06:11:00 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3897#comment-10280 The partners concerned are accused of major crimes and should have been suspended the moment they were taken into custody. The partners concerned are accused of major crimes and should have been suspended the moment they were taken into custody.

]]> By: Dennis Howlett http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/27/pricewaterhouse-finally-acts-on-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-5626 Dennis Howlett Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:42:33 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3897#comment-5626 @mohit - of course she knows that. Yet PWC, same as other Big 4 claim global brand status as though they're ONE firm. They can't have it all ways. @mohit – of course she knows that. Yet PWC, same as other Big 4 claim global brand status as though they're ONE firm. They can't have it all ways.

]]> By: mohit http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/27/pricewaterhouse-finally-acts-on-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-5627 mohit Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:20:54 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3897#comment-5627 I wonder does Francine McKenna aware that each member firm of PwC is an independent firms of the global network of firms which carry the PwC name , therefore the Indian firm of PwC is wholly owned by Indian partners. Accordingly, generally the authority to respond to any question would lie with the Indian member firm of PwC.<br><br>Accordingly, maybe the US firm of PwC was following strict cross country protocol established over 100 years + being in existence in both India & US and not because they lack fire power in terms of PR machinery. I wonder does Francine McKenna aware that each member firm of PwC is an independent firms of the global network of firms which carry the PwC name , therefore the Indian firm of PwC is wholly owned by Indian partners. Accordingly, generally the authority to respond to any question would lie with the Indian member firm of PwC.

Accordingly, maybe the US firm of PwC was following strict cross country protocol established over 100 years + being in existence in both India & US and not because they lack fire power in terms of PR machinery.

]]> By: mohit http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/27/pricewaterhouse-finally-acts-on-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-5625 mohit Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:20:54 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3897#comment-5625 I wonder does Francine McKenna aware that each member firm of PwC is an independent firms of the global network of firms which carry the PwC name , therefore the Indian firm of PwC is wholly owned by Indian partners. Accordingly, generally the authority to respond to any question would lie with the Indian member firm of PwC.Accordingly, maybe the US firm of PwC was following strict cross country protocol established over 100 years + being in existence in both India & US and not because they lack fire power in terms of PR machinery. I wonder does Francine McKenna aware that each member firm of PwC is an independent firms of the global network of firms which carry the PwC name , therefore the Indian firm of PwC is wholly owned by Indian partners. Accordingly, generally the authority to respond to any question would lie with the Indian member firm of PwC.Accordingly, maybe the US firm of PwC was following strict cross country protocol established over 100 years + being in existence in both India & US and not because they lack fire power in terms of PR machinery.

]]> By: mohit http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/27/pricewaterhouse-finally-acts-on-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-9465 mohit Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:20:00 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3897#comment-9465 I wonder does Francine McKenna aware that each member firm of PwC is an independent firms of the global network of firms which carry the PwC name , therefore the Indian firm of PwC is wholly owned by Indian partners. Accordingly, generally the authority to respond to any question would lie with the Indian member firm of PwC. Accordingly, maybe the US firm of PwC was following strict cross country protocol established over 100 years + being in existence in both India & US and not because they lack fire power in terms of PR machinery. I wonder does Francine McKenna aware that each member firm of PwC is an independent firms of the global network of firms which carry the PwC name , therefore the Indian firm of PwC is wholly owned by Indian partners. Accordingly, generally the authority to respond to any question would lie with the Indian member firm of PwC.

Accordingly, maybe the US firm of PwC was following strict cross country protocol established over 100 years + being in existence in both India & US and not because they lack fire power in terms of PR machinery.

]]> By: PwC to fail? | AccMan http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/01/27/pricewaterhouse-finally-acts-on-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-5624 PwC to fail? | AccMan Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:57:39 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=3897#comment-5624 [...] Pricewaterhouse finally acts on Satyam (accmanpro.com) [...] [...] Pricewaterhouse finally acts on Satyam (accmanpro.com) [...]

]]>