The only liquidity…

by admin on February 10, 2009

in General

…in the market today seems to be the lube greasing us up from behind for the financial rape we’re about to take thanks to our central and commercial banking friends. ENOUGH ALREADY, I’m starting to get sore!

So says Jr Deputy Accountant. Are you getting the sense that despite all the calming words and a new adminnistration in the US that there is very little trust out there? Which makes an interesting segue to this piece of counterpoint about Twitter’s latest money making thoughts and how the atmosphere there looks like some sort of suspended reality:

Neither Williams nor Stone [founders] will get into the details of their revenue strategies, though each says that charging companies for brand verification (assuring users that JetBlue’s Twitter is really from JetBlue, for example) and for targeted prompts for users to join company feeds seems to make more long-term sense than straightforward web advertising, which Stone says “feels tacked on.” Another possibility would be charging users to “buy” friends’ feeds, almost like a subscription, though both executives are wary of any model that charges individual users.

When you ask Williams and Stone about revenue, they’ll—reflexively, defensively—remind you how young the company is, then they’ll point out that they have to worry about first making sure their product is flawless, then they’ll note that no one asked Google in 1998 how it was going to make money, then they’ll gripe that just because everyone else on the planet is terrified about money right now doesn’t mean they have to be.

Elsewhere, I’ve speculated that there is money to be made from ‘free’ but I don’t see Twitter being the vehicle through which that happens. They’ve been ‘free’ too long and there’s a certain psychology attached to that.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

No threat, Dennis. Just my $0.02. :)

I am not referring to this particular exchange, I'm talking about the exchange we had about the accounting blogosphere in general several weeks ago (or maybe a week? Hell if I know. Time is distorted lately with all that's going on the financial world these days)... point being, I'd rather you be on my side than against me. And I think the e-mail I wrote you left SEVERAL unanswered questions to which you in particular may have offered some insight. But you, in your own words, didn't find my questions worthy of a response. Which to me is like an "f you"... and I don't take kindly to that sort of response.

We can either be on the same team or at war against each other. And I don't know about *you* but I would much rather prefer to have a force like you on my side. And hope you feel the same.

@adriennne: What I think requires a response is MY privilege and not for you to dictate. FWIW, I'm not on anyone's 'team' and don't appreciate threats of this kind. Please calm down.

Duh? I didn't know email creates an obligation for me to respond. In any event I can't see anything that requires a response.

Oh so you can QUOTE me on your site but can't respond to my e-mails? I'm honored and offended at the same time, Dennis.

Previous post:

Next post: