The burning education question

by admin on February 19, 2009

in General,Tax and Ethics

This from a guest post at AccountancyAge (via PCW) is possibly the most important question I’ve seen asked about the future of the profession:

It is clearly not sufficient to limit our learning to a question of increasingly technical methods and standards. This has been the trajectory of accounting regulation since 1970 culminating in IFRS, which recent events have shown to be both ineffectual and overly complicated.

As for who should lead this debate, those in charge of the professional bodies have thus far avoided it.

However, academics have the potential here. We are the ones writing the books and researching the failures but, to date, we have tended to accept the syllabuses set by the professional bodies rather than trying to influence them.

The current economic crisis presents an opportunity for a new debate between those in-charge of training the next generation of accountants and those researching the accounting failures of the past and present.

Given the potential impact of the current crisis and the reduction of the Big Eight to the Big Four over the course of 40 years, it may not be too big a statement to make that the future of the accounting profession as we know it depends on its willingness to engage in such a debate.

My highlights. These are incredibly important statements that put the disconnect between educators and the profession in sharp relief.

If, like me, you look upon a profession that has provided you with a good living but feel undervalued, underserved, under pressure and generally despised because of the actions of others then this is the kind of debate you all need to be having. However, past experience of the Big Four’s influence in the UK is far from satisfactory for the vast majority of professionals. Their agenda is way different to that of the majority and, as as recent history has shown, is best described as toxic. I would caution upon their involvement except on an equal footing with others.

I would be asking our learned professor to enumerate and evaluate what history is telling us in the economic context before engaging in this debate.

Update: the slightly whacky but always entertaining Adrienne Gonzalez, who teaches accounting talks about the millenials’ perspective. It’s a tough but important read for anyone looking at this through the lens of a 40+ practitioner.

Hat tip to Francine for Tweeting the link.

Image courtesy of econsolidatedaccounts.net

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Comments on this entry are closed.

Junior February 19, 2009 at 7:55 am

If I could wave the white flag on behalf of my entire generation I would, Dennis :) I think both sides have a lot of work ahead of us in meeting halfway.

(and between you and I, I don't know how in the hell you guys put up with us… shhh)

alastair February 19, 2009 at 1:02 pm

but surely the problem with IFRS is that it is the product of an academic with a fixed view of the purpose of financial statements that does not accord with reality. We used to have a principles based system where professional judgement formed a part of the system – and as far as I am concerned it was a system that worked.

syeds May 12, 2010 at 10:01 am

I think most of the people does not think on this matter, the person who tought us does not have any real value. And debate who do accounting and who in charge of training the next generation
Education Questionnaire

nancy May 12, 2010 at 10:01 am

I think most of the people does not think on this matter, the person who tought us does not have any real value. And debate who do accounting and who in charge of training the next generation
Education Questionnaire

Previous post:

Next post: