You are here: Home » General » Microsoft’s payroll blooper

Microsoft’s payroll blooper

by Dennis Howlett on February 22, 2009

msletter

The Microsoft haters were predictably out in force on TechCrunch, following apparent errors in calculating severance pay for at least some former employees culled in its recent cutback of 1,400 staff. Microsoft has acknowledged that errors have been made but has not quantified the extent.

Much of the discussion  – if you can call it that – centres on whether former employees have a duty to repay with most saying former employees should do nothing. The precise position is unclear and Google searches don’t help. One search result suggests the position is unequivocal. They must repay. Another says ‘it depends’ though veering towards repayment.

The letters that have been sent (see above) represent what looks like the least unfriendly of formal requests, avoiding ‘demand’ style language. Even so, this is an unusual area that will have legal eagles scratching their heads. Pay is the most sensitive topic for any employee. Employees put their faith in employers for making the correct calculations. Mistakes are made and in an ongoing situation can usually be easily fixed. This situation is unusual because employees are no longer with the company. My guess is that the discretionary element included in the final gross pay calculations has been incorrectly transferred from the originating document (probably a spreadsheet) and this has only been picked up on post calculation review.

Much is made of the PR gaff and yes, Microsoft will end up with egg on its corporate face. At a time when layoffs are common in the tech industry, HR/payroll departments will be on high alert to make sure these types of error are kept to a minimum.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark
  • According to this article, Microsoft admits they should have handled their mistake in a "more toughtful manner" http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1644224...
    Apparently they are reaching out to those who have lost their jobs and telling them they will not seek repayment. In addition, it seems there were an "unspecified number of former employees [who were] paid smaller severance packages than they deserved" and they are "taking care of underpayments."
  • I don't know US law, but in Australia and New Zealand, the employee has to pay back any over payments. HOWEVER, the employer has to come to a private arrangement with the employee, who has the upper hand - to the extent that (theoretically), they can take as long as they like.

    BTW, no, I don't know how MS would allow for the outstanding repayments on their books.
  • I expect there is significant variability across states and countries. I've heard that in Eire it's a case of employer loses, in the UK, it depends. Other territories?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: