<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#039;s payroll blooper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/02/22/microsofts-payroll-blooper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/02/22/microsofts-payroll-blooper/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn M</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/02/22/microsofts-payroll-blooper/comment-page-1/#comment-5840</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=4151#comment-5840</guid>
		<description>According to this article, Microsoft admits they should have handled their mistake in a &quot;more toughtful manner&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1644224/microsoft_says_keep_your_severance/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1644224/m...&lt;/a&gt;
Apparently they are reaching out to those who have lost their jobs and telling them they will not seek repayment. In addition, it seems there were an &quot;unspecified number of former employees [who were] paid smaller severance packages than they deserved&quot; and they are &quot;taking care of underpayments.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this article, Microsoft admits they should have handled their mistake in a &quot;more toughtful manner&quot; <a href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1644224/microsoft_says_keep_your_severance/" rel="nofollow">http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1644224/m&#8230;</a><br />
Apparently they are reaching out to those who have lost their jobs and telling them they will not seek repayment. In addition, it seems there were an &quot;unspecified number of former employees [who were] paid smaller severance packages than they deserved&quot; and they are &quot;taking care of underpayments.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/02/22/microsofts-payroll-blooper/comment-page-1/#comment-5839</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=4151#comment-5839</guid>
		<description>I expect there is significant variability across states and countries. I&#039;ve heard that in Eire it&#039;s a case of employer loses, in the UK, it depends. Other territories?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect there is significant variability across states and countries. I&#039;ve heard that in Eire it&#039;s a case of employer loses, in the UK, it depends. Other territories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin english</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/02/22/microsofts-payroll-blooper/comment-page-1/#comment-5838</link>
		<dc:creator>martin english</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=4151#comment-5838</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know US law, but in Australia and New Zealand, the employee has to pay back any over payments.  HOWEVER, the employer has to come to a private arrangement with the employee, who has the upper hand - to the extent that (theoretically), they can take as long as they like.

BTW, no, I don&#039;t know how MS would allow for the outstanding repayments on their books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know US law, but in Australia and New Zealand, the employee has to pay back any over payments.  HOWEVER, the employer has to come to a private arrangement with the employee, who has the upper hand &#8211; to the extent that (theoretically), they can take as long as they like.</p>
<p>BTW, no, I don&#039;t know how MS would allow for the outstanding repayments on their books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

