You are here: Home » General » PWC’s blood stained ties

PWC’s blood stained ties

by Dennis Howlett on March 29, 2009

In a long, angry but well researched piece in the San Francisco Bay View:

One of the multinational corporations affiliated with UNHCR is PricewaterhouseCoopers International (PWC), a New York “accounting” firm that earned $US 28.2 billion in revenues in 2008. PWC is also a shareholder involved in the niobium/tantalum (pyrochlore) mine at Lueshe, North Kivu, at the heart of the Rwandan “Tutsi rebel” occupation in eastern Congo.[6][7] PWC was the dominant majority shareholder of Somikivu s.c.a.r.l., a company established in Congo (Zaire) in 1984 and controlled in North Kivu for numerous years past by troops under the command of Rwandan warlords Laurent Nkunda and Jules Mutebusi, both wanted war criminals.[8]

The crimes and war crimes committed by the management of the PricewaterhouseCoopers company Somikivu since the year 2000 up until now will not be quoted here,” wrote the authors of a 2006 letter calling on the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development to address PWC for violations of OECD guidelines for multinational corporations.[9]

In budget year 2008, PWC offices worldwide collectively “donated” $US 1,511,982 to UNHCR.[10] PricewaterhouseCoopers has also served as the “chartered accountants” for Canadian Banro Corp.[11]

Banro is a gold company with four wholly owned properties that operates only in eastern DRC and was “awarded” gold concessions comprising 5,730 square kms (2,212 square miles). Banro personnel are ferried over the remote and blood-drenched South Kivu landscape by private helicopters. From Dec. 31, 2005, to Sept. 31, 2008, Banro – always declaring a loss – increased its assets from $US 100 million to $US 121 million. In the same period, more than 1,000 Congolese people died daily – roughly 1,000,000 victims. Banro Corp. identifies some 9 million ounces of gold on “their” properties, concessions valued at over $US 7.63 billion – and this is just one of the many foreign companies pillaging Congo.

How does a Canadian mining company come to “wholly own” land in blood drenched eastern Congo? Banro advertises itself as one of Congo’s great benefactors “well-positioned to benefit from the timely economic, social and political recovery of the DRC.”[12] In reality, the ongoing white-collar business operations of Banro Corp. amidst the massive depopulation are crimes against humanity.

[6] http://www.unhcr.org/partners/PARTNERS/483c14692.pdf.

[7] “Conflict and Development: Peacebuilding and Post-conflict Resolution; Sixth Report of Session 2005-06,” Parliament Great Britain International Development Committee, 2006, pp. 247, 251.

[8] You will find an unconscionable propaganda piece favorable to Rwanda’s Gen. Laurent Nkunda published as an “exclusive interview” in the Huffington Post by this writer’s former colleague. See Georgianne Nienaber’s “Congo Rebel Leader Accused of War Crimes Tells His Story,” Huffington Post, Jan. 9, 2009.

[9] Letter titled “Violation of OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises Through
PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltd. New York” by Mag. Thomas Eggenburg, Vienna, March 27, 2006. It is important to recognize that the interested parties who brought the PricewaterhouseCoopers crimes to light are themselves corporate competitors interested in controlling the Lueshe mine: Kroll Associates.

[10] Donations often occur in the form of tax write-offs that provide significant and expeditious benefits to the “donors” due to their timing and amounts, http://www.unhcr.org/partners/PARTNERS/483c14692.pdf.

[11] Banro Corp., SEC Form 6-K 2006; and http://infoventure.tsx.com/TSXVenture/TSXVentureHttpController?GetPage=CompanySummary&PO_ID=1062237&HC_FLAG1=on.

[12] Banro Corp., “Why Africa and the DRC?” http://www.banro.com/s/WhyCongo.asp.

[My emphasis added, references extracted for clarity]

Isn’t there something unethical about all of this?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark
  • "PWC is also a shareholder involved in the niobium/tantalum (pyrochlore) mine at Lueshe, North Kivu"

    I went to #11, which just shows the the auditors are PWC and BDO.

    Seems like a bit of clueless writing if you're mixing up shareholders with investors!

    This doesn't take away from the other allegations, but it does make me raise an eyebrow is someone is this careless.
  • I'm still confused... upon further review it looks like they equated donations to the UN with mining investments? Uh.... what?
  • There's a distinction between the mining operations to which the author refers and Banro, a Canadian Corp where PwC and BDO are named in the doc at [11] I don't think there is a confusion on the shareholder side as the reference [6][7] is before those references. Having said that, the author is drawing a dotted line between donations and shareholdings. Given what we know about the nature of corruption, that should not be a surprise.
  • Daniel Daily
    Being an auditor would actually exclude one from being a shareholder...

    Donations to UNHCR being equated to corruption... well that would suppose that the UNHCR could get you leverage which seems like a poor way to go about it.

    Also if you look at the donations document referred to there are entries from many, many PwC territories - France, Switzerland, Australia etc. - if you think there is any way that these organizations would be acting in concert for any purpose, not to mention something shady, you have a very naive view of how these companies operate - they keep very strictly to themselves and hardly operate in unison on any matter.
  • Pantomime horse is how I tend to think of PwC
  • Antonio Toro
    What a nonsense!!!!

    PwC is a SERVICE firm, not an insitiutional investor or mining company.

    PwC does not have a balance sheet to carry this (or any other) investment. In fact, would be stupid to invest in any business: PwC would be precluded from doing any work to the business itself and probably would not be welcomed by the business' competitors!!!!

    Do not believe in whatever someone post on the Internet !!!
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: