You are here: Home » General » We need some tech savvy accountants in Parliament

We need some tech savvy accountants in Parliament

by Dennis Howlett on March 31, 2009

The other day I was bemoaning the cost to the taxpayer of dumping the Dumfermline Building Society. I said we need some number crunchers in Parliament. Today, it is MP’s expenses and we still need number crunchers.

Courtesy of a Tweet from a very annoyed Martyn Shiner, I discover over at Letters from a Tory:

Stationery and postage - After Siobhain McDonagh of the Labour Party racked up a bill of £13,900 on stationery and then spent an extra £35,207 of taxpayers’ money on posting letters, there was a mini-crackdown on this expense.  A new maximum of £7,000 was set, and the winner of this award is… David Drew from the Labour Party! David was the only MP to spend the maximum, and Labour can boast 18 of the top 20 big spenders on stationery and postage.  In fact, the first non-Labour MP in the list is in 18th position. His name? David Cameron.  TOTAL COST TO TAXPAYER: £2,261,079

IT - fairly self-explanatory, as MPs can spend our money on buying themselves new IT equipment.  The winner of the award for the MP who spent the most on IT services goes to… Liam Byrne of the Labour Party!  He managed to hold onto his title by blowing £2,721 on IT last year, almost £200 more than he spent last year and over £800 more than any of his competitors.  Labour have 35 of the top 50 IT spenders.  TOTAL COST TO TAXPAYER: £773,438

That’s £3,034,517 – most of which could have been avoided.

Why is it necessary to send letters when we have email? Or if documents must be schlepped around then what’s wrong with services like Boxes.net, edocr for sharing or echosign for documents that need signatures? Each of these services is very low cost and I’m sure it wouldn’t be beyond the wit of someone engaged in procurement to negotiate a club rate for any or all of these services? Well – maybe that’s a stretch but you get my drift.

But how do MP’s manage to blow £2.2+ million on IT? Is there no recycling of laptops? Hasn’t anyone from central buying done a bulk deal? Is it the case that somehow the butt clenching rules that apply to government departments somehow don’t apply ot MPs?

Bring on the tech savvy accountants I say. Better still – someone like Martyn who’s had to build systems out of thin air for a small business. These people know more tan any MP will ever understand about the need to run a tight ship. But then I suppose there is one slight difference. With a small business, it’s their money. With MP’s, it’s someone else’s – yours.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark
  • Thanks for mentioning and tweeting http://www.edocr.com. From a sideline, it is unbelievable, the amount of expenses MPs and Ministers are allowed to draw. I see this as nothing but state institutionalized corruption. Western powers refer to politics in developing world as corrupt. I consider British politics as no difference from the rest of the world. They should all be held accountable, especially during these times of economic difficulties

    Best regards
    Manoj
  • Dennis

    We do not have to have techy accountants, although they would surely help.

    It would be helpful to have responsible leaders, 1/2 decent managers and then a P&L and Balance Sheet we could all understand. Budgets might even be zero-base for the 2010-2011 financial year, as by then we will rally be in trouble.

    The IT spend on PCs is dwarfed by the NHS "Spine" project - I think it is about in England £ 13,000,000,000 and they still don't really know what they are doing. Likewise yesterday the Further Education colleges and DIUS over-spend by £ 6,000,000,000 because they did not have any financial monitoring system.

    The government would be pushed to run a corner shop ; but we give it our taxes. Shame on us !

    All the PFI, the un-funded pension schemes and the rest are off the balance sheet

    The other day someone thought we were £ 250,000 per head in debt for the UK
  • Dennis

    You're right - they're not tech savvy

    But a word in defence of Favid Drew - a friend of mine - he's not a guy I can imagine abusing postage stamps. He does have a big rural constituency that is a decided marginal which may explain the cost though

    But let's also be realitsic - I'm political, know Westminster failty well, want change and really can't imagine how I could achieve what I have by being an MP

    It is a bum job.

    Richard
  • Well I am not an expert in the ways of Parliament, but based on our EchoSign experience, I am pretty sure it's because they don't personally foot the bill as you note: "With a small business, it’s their money. With MP’s, it’s someone else’s - yours.". The one thing that ties together our 9,000 customers tiny/small/medium/large is they all having a strong incentive to go paperless -- to make more money by closing customers faster over the web.

    Government has not been a strong vertical for us, to say the least ;)
  • Martyn
    Dennis,

    Oh and the £2.2 million would have been substantially reduced had they used FOSS, which I bet they didn't - bet most of them are running around with top of the range Sony Vaio laptops running Vista or MacBooks.

    Martyn

    PS I know you are a Mac fanboy, but you have to pay for your own kit, so that is OK.
  • Martyn
    Dennis

    Tx for the hat tip.

    Martyn
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: