Comments on: Comply or else http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/25/comply-or-else/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Dennis Howlett http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/25/comply-or-else/comment-page-1/#comment-6469 Dennis Howlett Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:06:02 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=4993#comment-6469 "I think the concept of “best practice” is flawed. All it really means is compliance with the currently endorsed fad." - I agree. The problem is that without something like this in place then you can be sure that compliance will be a fantasy. What surprises me is that UK plc doesn't seem to understand that some regulation is important to ensuring that egregious behaviour is mitigated. "I think the concept of “best practice” is flawed. All it really means is compliance with the currently endorsed fad." – I agree. The problem is that without something like this in place then you can be sure that compliance will be a fantasy. What surprises me is that UK plc doesn't seem to understand that some regulation is important to ensuring that egregious behaviour is mitigated.

]]> By: alastair http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/25/comply-or-else/comment-page-1/#comment-6468 alastair Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:52:06 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=4993#comment-6468 OK but who says companies are able to dictate the content of "best practice"? Either they comply or they don't. If they don't then the facts are disclosed and its up to the shareholders. Personally I think the concept of "best practice" is flawed. All it really means is compliance with the currently endorsed fad. OK but who says companies are able to dictate the content of "best practice"? Either they comply or they don't. If they don't then the facts are disclosed and its up to the shareholders.

Personally I think the concept of "best practice" is flawed. All it really means is compliance with the currently endorsed fad.

]]>