There are few things that leave me gobsmacked but the above headline from Times of India is up there among stuff that requires a double take. The detail:
The questioning of Ramesh Rajan, chairman and CEO of PricewaterhouseCoopers, India (PwC) by CBI last week, has revealed that the
Satyam balance sheets were in fact audited by Lovelock & Lewes and not Price Waterhouse (PW). It is also learnt that the auditing fees, though deposited in the name of Price Waterhouse, Bangalore, was later transferred into the account of Lovelock & Lewes. “It is from here that the partners S Gopalakrishnan and Srinivas Talluri withdrew the money,” sources involved in the investigation of the case told TOI.
If that wasn’t risible enough, the report goes on to say:
The partners denied any association with PW, Bangalore and said that Gopalakrishnan and Talluri were not entitled to sign any balance sheet on behalf of PW. “So as it turns out, the auditors who are partners with PW, Bangalore, wrongly signed under the name of PW, and also outsourced the work to Lovelock & Lewes,” said sources adding that investigations confirm that the entire auditing team at Satyam is from Lovelock & Lewes.
On being questioned by CBI about this “outsourcing” of work , Rajan, who is also a partner with PW, Bangalore said that the firm has no manpower and, hence, as part of an internal arrangement gives out their work to Lovelock and Lewes. “But this is not acceptable, considering that the two firms are completely different entities,” said sources.
An India-based auditing firm, Lovelock & Lewes, though is a network firm of the international consulting body PwC, has no authority to audit under PwC’s name.
Are you kidding me? So let’s get this straight:
- PWC were the auditors of record but didn’t do the work
PWC audit partners signed off
PWC received fees and then paid to an associate firm
but..they didn’t do the work and, by implication are not therefore to blame AND
Lovelock and Lewes are a PWC network consulting firm.
The question surely must be: How deep a hole does PWC want to dig for itself because this now takes on an entirely different flavour? Satyam is a US listed company. There are strict rules about what entities can audit public companies. Lovelock & Lewes would fail that test. By implication, PWC has failed that test. Bring on the lawyers.
One day there will be a real accounting comedian who will be able to drink long and deep at the Satyam pond.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Post-Satyam scam, PWC India to set up advisory board (taragana.com)
- For Satyam Auditors, an Ordeal Before Trial (nytimes.com)
- India Charges 9 After Inquiry of Outsourcing Company (nytimes.com)
- A web of deceit (mycompuquest.blogspot.com)
- A True Picture of India, anyone?? (prathambooks.org)
loading...
loading...
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b04106f0-43d5-4acf-baf9-bab3a347a33b)

