<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: PWC: &#8216;We didn&#8217;t audit Satyam&#8217;</title> <atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/30/pwc-we-didnt-audit-satyam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/30/pwc-we-didnt-audit-satyam/</link> <description>never knowingly under opinionated</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:42:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: PwC under fire re: Cattles. Another shoe drops? &#124; AccMan</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/30/pwc-we-didnt-audit-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-397136</link> <dc:creator>PwC under fire re: Cattles. Another shoe drops? &#124; AccMan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:58:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5030#comment-397136</guid> <description>[...] the firms are waiting to see whether PwC gets hammered over the Satyam debacle. Our view is that PwC is heavily implicated in the Satyam case, either by accident of design and that it is potentially on the hook for as much as $4 billion, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the firms are waiting to see whether PwC gets hammered over the Satyam debacle. Our view is that PwC is heavily implicated in the Satyam case, either by accident of design and that it is potentially on the hook for as much as $4 billion, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: AccountancyAge, The Guardian: you&#8217;re a bunch of douche bags &#124; AccMan</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/30/pwc-we-didnt-audit-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-396469</link> <dc:creator>AccountancyAge, The Guardian: you&#8217;re a bunch of douche bags &#124; AccMan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:24:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5030#comment-396469</guid> <description>[...] no and no. That&#8217;s PWC PR BS. PWC India is on record to say that it couldn&#8217;t cope with the audit &#8211; so&#8230;to put it bluntly..who is lying? And why didn&#8217;t AA ask the obvious [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no and no. That&#8217;s PWC PR BS. PWC India is on record to say that it couldn&#8217;t cope with the audit &#8211; so&#8230;to put it bluntly..who is lying? And why didn&#8217;t AA ask the obvious [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PWC claims it did not audit Satyam &#124; called2account</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/30/pwc-we-didnt-audit-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-396404</link> <dc:creator>PWC claims it did not audit Satyam &#124; called2account</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:45:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5030#comment-396404</guid> <description>[...] Dennis Howlett says on this: Are you kidding me? So let’s get this straight: PWC were the auditors of record but [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dennis Howlett says on this: Are you kidding me? So let’s get this straight: PWC were the auditors of record but [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PWC claims it did not audit Satyam &#124; called2account</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/30/pwc-we-didnt-audit-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-396403</link> <dc:creator>PWC claims it did not audit Satyam &#124; called2account</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:45:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5030#comment-396403</guid> <description>[...] Dennis Howlett says on this: Are you kidding me? So let’s get this straight: PWC were the auditors of record but [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dennis Howlett says on this: Are you kidding me? So let’s get this straight: PWC were the auditors of record but [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tax Research UK &#187; PWC claims it did not audit Satyam</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/30/pwc-we-didnt-audit-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-396401</link> <dc:creator>Tax Research UK &#187; PWC claims it did not audit Satyam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:47:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5030#comment-396401</guid> <description>[...] Dennis Howlett says on this: Are you kidding me? So let’s get this straight: PWC were the auditors of record but [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dennis Howlett says on this: Are you kidding me? So let’s get this straight: PWC were the auditors of record but [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dennis Howlett</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/06/30/pwc-we-didnt-audit-satyam/comment-page-1/#comment-396394</link> <dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:24:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5030#comment-396394</guid> <description>Allegedly so on the surface at least but in reality I reckon they&#039;re making it up as they go along.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allegedly so on the surface at least but in reality I reckon they&#8217;re making it up as they go along.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 11/26 queries in 0.156 seconds using disk

Served from: www.accmanpro.com @ 2010-03-17 01:19:06 -->