You are here: Home » General » Rethinking the role of women

Rethinking the role of women

by Dennis Howlett on August 1, 2009

Earlier today I had a fascinating conversation with Francine McKenna. We don’t always agree and that’s fine but there is much where we are closely aligned. During the discussion which went on for more than an hour and a half and could easily have gone on another couple of hours, we talked about new business models and the role of women. Or rather the fact women are so poorly represented in C-level positions. How many female partners do you know?

As it happens I am deep into attempting to define a new business model. It isn’t easy when you see massive incumbent players who at best appear dumb, fat and happy and to which customers gleefully pay for play. Francine opened the kimono a little on endeavouring to find a model that works for women. That lead me to this post by Susan Scrupski on Technically Women:

I can assure you, when the planning boards convene to review speaker selections, we are gender blind. We are looking for the best content; the best individuals to fill the agenda. At various times (when it even occurs to me), I myself may bring up the gender issue as I’m sensitive to it. Immediately, my board colleagues respond, “Oh yes, of course, we need more women!” But this process always bothers me, as if women are a special needs category- the Section 8(a) of tech conference planning.

My advice to women who want to be heard: speak up.

Brave words but then it reminded me of a lawyer I engaged many years ago. She was a partner in an all women practice who helped me in a divorce matter. It was refreshing and the best thing I could have done. Not only was she willing to take my case, she fought just as tenaciously as any male lawyer might have done and gave rock solid advice. Like most men I can think of, I was initially sceptical but I was persuaded by her credentials and recommendations I received from others – both men and women.

In the past, it seems to me that most often, women have had to fight, scramble and crawl to make any impression on the male bastions of power but perhaps that can change. As Francine and I were talking, it dawned on me that with technology being what it is today, there is nothing to stop women working out a new business model, one that works for them and which rewards them for ability rather than them having to try grab the coat tails of men. Freely available technology allows women an equal chance to succeed. By definition it will be radical, by which I mean not bound by the ‘rules’ we currently understand. That’s goodness.

But it will require enormous reserves of will and a different kind of strength to pull it off. Just as I am trying to rethink a business model that flies in the face of accepted norms, women will have to do the same. Curiously, I feel aligned to what Francine was saying. We may well be paddling in parallel boats. It’s going to be an interesting ride. So why the headline? That’s easy: playing by the established rules isn’t going to work. If you believe, as I do, that there is an equal role for women in business then it is up to them to define their role. Not men. As Susan says: ’speak up.’

In the meantime, if this is a topic that interests then check out @Tech_Women. It will provide insights into the minds of some of the smartest women I have the pleasure to know.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Share/Bookmark
  • I follow you as @dxs_1 and am pleased to find this via your twitter log. I found Susan Scrupski's yesterday. I second that her article and @Tech_Women are worth checking out. I agree that "we need more women" is a phrase that leads into 2nd class consideration. I think most women consider the title "best in their field" preferable to "best woman in their field" and yes, "speak up."
  • Naomi Bloom
    I created a new business model when I launched my solo consulting practice in 1987, and I've never looked back. I had gone as far as I could go at a terrific systems consulting/custom software firm, AMS, and I had failed to persuade the senior partners that there was a terrific business opportunity in human resource management systems. I was running their Federal HR systems practice, which was large and profitable, and they wanted me to keep right on doing that in spite of my no longer enjoying it and seeing another area that I thought would be very profitable. The rest, as they say, is history, and I've had a terrific 22+ year run. Your post reinforced how very comfortable I am bringing a woman's approach to business as part of my consulting schtick.
  • Dennis -

    This is a phenomenally good point - and appeals to me because I believe that a lot of human behavior is influenced by the structure of our organizations... so why not structure them in a way that takes advantage of the way we want to work? I also believe that if we structure organizations to be better for women, it will also benefit everyone... while I went to a women's college and believe it is powerful to spend time with people 'like' you - whatever that means to you - it is dangerous over a career or a lifetime to isolate either a group in that way. I actually believe that healthy diversity leads to the best organizations. In the work world we've got organizations that were build largely by men and have tilted toward benefiting the aggressive and competitive traits. All women's organizations tend to tilt toward being so consensus driven that it is hard to move forward. Neither is ideal but I think a blend creates a give and take that it better for everyone.

    I think it is high time to re-think how we structure businesses in general - so here's to business model innovation!
  • MCG
    It is refreshing to see women that understand that being given a role versus earning their position makes them a second class citizen. I want to be respected for my knowledge, insight and skills. Not just there because I am a representative - and if not me, it would just be some other random chic down the hall. If I don't deserve it (promotion, job, speaking opportunity, whatever) then don't 'give' it to me. It even bothers me with people emphasize 'he OR she'; I feel like I have to have some sort of special treatment.

    One has to look at what percentage of the available population is female. If there are no women (or whatever minority) available, then don't force someone there just be cause you think ought to. But keep in mind that there is a difference between purposeful exclusion and opportunity. We also have to understand that there is ignorance out there; some people may not know where to look for the smart women. So we do have to speak up. Not yell that we deserve something we don't, but to tell the world that we are out here, intelligent and capable.

    I do have one question, why is a new business model needed for women?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: