<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking the role of women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Women in Business Tuesday Club &#124; Women in Business</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-6647</link>
		<dc:creator>Women in Business Tuesday Club &#124; Women in Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-6647</guid>
		<description>[...] Rethinking the role of women (accmanpro.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rethinking the role of women (accmanpro.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCG</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-6645</link>
		<dc:creator>MCG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-6645</guid>
		<description>It is refreshing to see women that understand that being given a role versus earning their position makes them a second class citizen.  I want to be respected for my knowledge, insight and skills. Not just there because I am a representative - and if not me, it would just be some other random chic down the hall.  If I don&#039;t deserve it (promotion, job, speaking opportunity, whatever) then don&#039;t &#039;give&#039; it to me.  It even bothers me with people emphasize &#039;he OR she&#039;; I feel like I have to have some sort of special treatment.

One has to look at what percentage of the available population is female.  If there are no women (or whatever minority) available, then don&#039;t force someone there just be cause you think ought to.  But keep in mind that there is a difference between purposeful exclusion and opportunity.  We also have to understand that there is ignorance out there; some people may not know where to look for the smart women.  So we do have to speak up.  Not yell that we deserve something we don&#039;t, but to tell the world that we are out here, intelligent and capable.

I do have one question, why is a new business model needed for women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is refreshing to see women that understand that being given a role versus earning their position makes them a second class citizen.  I want to be respected for my knowledge, insight and skills. Not just there because I am a representative &#8211; and if not me, it would just be some other random chic down the hall.  If I don&#039;t deserve it (promotion, job, speaking opportunity, whatever) then don&#039;t &#039;give&#039; it to me.  It even bothers me with people emphasize &#039;he OR she&#039;; I feel like I have to have some sort of special treatment.</p>
<p>One has to look at what percentage of the available population is female.  If there are no women (or whatever minority) available, then don&#039;t force someone there just be cause you think ought to.  But keep in mind that there is a difference between purposeful exclusion and opportunity.  We also have to understand that there is ignorance out there; some people may not know where to look for the smart women.  So we do have to speak up.  Not yell that we deserve something we don&#039;t, but to tell the world that we are out here, intelligent and capable.</p>
<p>I do have one question, why is a new business model needed for women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Does it Take to be a &#8220;Top 10&#8243; Social Media Speaker? &#124; Social Media Group</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-6646</link>
		<dc:creator>What Does it Take to be a &#8220;Top 10&#8243; Social Media Speaker? &#124; Social Media Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-6646</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter back up today, it&#8217;s been much-discussed, and was subsequently re-posted on ZDnet by Dennis Howlett, so I thought I would share it with you here. I think part of the problem is many of us suck at two [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter back up today, it&#8217;s been much-discussed, and was subsequently re-posted on ZDnet by Dennis Howlett, so I thought I would share it with you here. I think part of the problem is many of us suck at two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oi! Are we invisible or something? &#124; Irregular Enterprise &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-6644</link>
		<dc:creator>Oi! Are we invisible or something? &#124; Irregular Enterprise &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-6644</guid>
		<description>[...] other week I ran a story: Rethinking the role of women on my personal weblog. I concluded that: So why the headline? That&#8217;s easy: playing by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other week I ran a story: Rethinking the role of women on my personal weblog. I concluded that: So why the headline? That&#8217;s easy: playing by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Happe</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-6643</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Happe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-6643</guid>
		<description>Dennis -

This is a phenomenally good point - and appeals to me because I believe that a lot of human behavior is influenced by the structure of our organizations... so why not structure them in a way that takes advantage of the way we want to work?  I also believe that if we structure organizations to be better for women, it will also benefit everyone... while I went to a women&#039;s college and believe it is powerful to spend time with people &#039;like&#039; you - whatever that means to you - it is dangerous over a career or a lifetime to isolate either a group in that way. I actually believe that healthy diversity leads to the best organizations. In the work world we&#039;ve got organizations that were build largely by men and have tilted toward benefiting the aggressive and competitive traits. All women&#039;s organizations tend to tilt toward being so consensus driven that it is hard to move forward. Neither is ideal but I think a blend creates a give and take that it better for everyone.

I think it is high time to re-think how we structure businesses in general - so here&#039;s to business model innovation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis -</p>
<p>This is a phenomenally good point &#8211; and appeals to me because I believe that a lot of human behavior is influenced by the structure of our organizations&#8230; so why not structure them in a way that takes advantage of the way we want to work?  I also believe that if we structure organizations to be better for women, it will also benefit everyone&#8230; while I went to a women&#039;s college and believe it is powerful to spend time with people &#039;like&#039; you &#8211; whatever that means to you &#8211; it is dangerous over a career or a lifetime to isolate either a group in that way. I actually believe that healthy diversity leads to the best organizations. In the work world we&#039;ve got organizations that were build largely by men and have tilted toward benefiting the aggressive and competitive traits. All women&#039;s organizations tend to tilt toward being so consensus driven that it is hard to move forward. Neither is ideal but I think a blend creates a give and take that it better for everyone.</p>
<p>I think it is high time to re-think how we structure businesses in general &#8211; so here&#039;s to business model innovation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renewal &#124; AccMan</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-6642</link>
		<dc:creator>Renewal &#124; AccMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-6642</guid>
		<description>[...] I had a wonderful conversation with someone whose gutsiness, determination and fearlessness I admire. It was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I had a wonderful conversation with someone whose gutsiness, determination and fearlessness I admire. It was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naomi Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-6641</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-6641</guid>
		<description>I created a new business model when I launched my solo consulting practice in 1987, and I&#039;ve never looked back.  I had gone as far as I could go at a terrific systems consulting/custom software firm, AMS, and I had failed to persuade the senior partners that there was a terrific business opportunity in human resource management systems. I was running their Federal HR systems practice, which was large and profitable, and they wanted me to keep right on doing that in spite of my no longer enjoying it and seeing another area that I thought would be very profitable.  The rest, as they say, is history, and I&#039;ve had a terrific 22+ year run.  Your post reinforced how very comfortable I am bringing a woman&#039;s approach to business as part of my consulting schtick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I created a new business model when I launched my solo consulting practice in 1987, and I&#039;ve never looked back.  I had gone as far as I could go at a terrific systems consulting/custom software firm, AMS, and I had failed to persuade the senior partners that there was a terrific business opportunity in human resource management systems. I was running their Federal HR systems practice, which was large and profitable, and they wanted me to keep right on doing that in spite of my no longer enjoying it and seeing another area that I thought would be very profitable.  The rest, as they say, is history, and I&#039;ve had a terrific 22+ year run.  Your post reinforced how very comfortable I am bringing a woman&#039;s approach to business as part of my consulting schtick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cailin Yates</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-6640</link>
		<dc:creator>Cailin Yates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-6640</guid>
		<description>I follow you as @dxs_1 and am pleased to find this via your twitter log. I found Susan Scrupski&#039;s yesterday.  I second that her article and @Tech_Women are worth checking out.  I agree that &quot;we need more women&quot; is a phrase that leads into 2nd class consideration.  I think most women  consider the title &quot;best in their field&quot; preferable to &quot;best woman in their field&quot; and yes, &quot;speak up.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow you as @dxs_1 and am pleased to find this via your twitter log. I found Susan Scrupski&#039;s yesterday.  I second that her article and @Tech_Women are worth checking out.  I agree that &quot;we need more women&quot; is a phrase that leads into 2nd class consideration.  I think most women  consider the title &quot;best in their field&quot; preferable to &quot;best woman in their field&quot; and yes, &quot;speak up.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

