<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Rethinking the role of women</title> <atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/</link> <description>never knowingly under opinionated</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:23:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Women in Business Tuesday Club &#124; Women in Business</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-397640</link> <dc:creator>Women in Business Tuesday Club &#124; Women in Business</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:33:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-397640</guid> <description>[...] Rethinking the role of women (accmanpro.com) [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rethinking the role of women (accmanpro.com) [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: What Does it Take to be a &#8220;Top 10&#8243; Social Media Speaker? &#124; Social Media Group</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-397459</link> <dc:creator>What Does it Take to be a &#8220;Top 10&#8243; Social Media Speaker? &#124; Social Media Group</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:16:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-397459</guid> <description>[...] Twitter back up today, it&#8217;s been much-discussed, and was subsequently re-posted on ZDnet by Dennis Howlett, so I thought I would share it with you here. I think part of the problem is many of us suck at two [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter back up today, it&#8217;s been much-discussed, and was subsequently re-posted on ZDnet by Dennis Howlett, so I thought I would share it with you here. I think part of the problem is many of us suck at two [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MCG</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-397457</link> <dc:creator>MCG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:49:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-397457</guid> <description>It is refreshing to see women that understand that being given a role versus earning their position makes them a second class citizen.  I want to be respected for my knowledge, insight and skills. Not just there because I am a representative - and if not me, it would just be some other random chic down the hall.  If I don&#039;t deserve it (promotion, job, speaking opportunity, whatever) then don&#039;t &#039;give&#039; it to me.  It even bothers me with people emphasize &#039;he OR she&#039;; I feel like I have to have some sort of special treatment.One has to look at what percentage of the available population is female.  If there are no women (or whatever minority) available, then don&#039;t force someone there just be cause you think ought to.  But keep in mind that there is a difference between purposeful exclusion and opportunity.  We also have to understand that there is ignorance out there; some people may not know where to look for the smart women.  So we do have to speak up.  Not yell that we deserve something we don&#039;t, but to tell the world that we are out here, intelligent and capable.I do have one question, why is a new business model needed for women?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is refreshing to see women that understand that being given a role versus earning their position makes them a second class citizen.  I want to be respected for my knowledge, insight and skills. Not just there because I am a representative &#8211; and if not me, it would just be some other random chic down the hall.  If I don&#8217;t deserve it (promotion, job, speaking opportunity, whatever) then don&#8217;t &#8216;give&#8217; it to me.  It even bothers me with people emphasize &#8216;he OR she&#8217;; I feel like I have to have some sort of special treatment.</p><p>One has to look at what percentage of the available population is female.  If there are no women (or whatever minority) available, then don&#8217;t force someone there just be cause you think ought to.  But keep in mind that there is a difference between purposeful exclusion and opportunity.  We also have to understand that there is ignorance out there; some people may not know where to look for the smart women.  So we do have to speak up.  Not yell that we deserve something we don&#8217;t, but to tell the world that we are out here, intelligent and capable.</p><p>I do have one question, why is a new business model needed for women?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Oi! Are we invisible or something? &#124; Irregular Enterprise &#124; ZDNet.com</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-397453</link> <dc:creator>Oi! Are we invisible or something? &#124; Irregular Enterprise &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:40:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-397453</guid> <description>[...] other week I ran a story: Rethinking the role of women on my personal weblog. I concluded that: So why the headline? That&#8217;s easy: playing by the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other week I ran a story: Rethinking the role of women on my personal weblog. I concluded that: So why the headline? That&#8217;s easy: playing by the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rachel Happe</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-397348</link> <dc:creator>Rachel Happe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:12:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-397348</guid> <description>Dennis -This is a phenomenally good point - and appeals to me because I believe that a lot of human behavior is influenced by the structure of our organizations... so why not structure them in a way that takes advantage of the way we want to work?  I also believe that if we structure organizations to be better for women, it will also benefit everyone... while I went to a women&#039;s college and believe it is powerful to spend time with people &#039;like&#039; you - whatever that means to you - it is dangerous over a career or a lifetime to isolate either a group in that way. I actually believe that healthy diversity leads to the best organizations. In the work world we&#039;ve got organizations that were build largely by men and have tilted toward benefiting the aggressive and competitive traits. All women&#039;s organizations tend to tilt toward being so consensus driven that it is hard to move forward. Neither is ideal but I think a blend creates a give and take that it better for everyone.I think it is high time to re-think how we structure businesses in general - so here&#039;s to business model innovation!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis -</p><p>This is a phenomenally good point &#8211; and appeals to me because I believe that a lot of human behavior is influenced by the structure of our organizations&#8230; so why not structure them in a way that takes advantage of the way we want to work?  I also believe that if we structure organizations to be better for women, it will also benefit everyone&#8230; while I went to a women&#8217;s college and believe it is powerful to spend time with people &#8216;like&#8217; you &#8211; whatever that means to you &#8211; it is dangerous over a career or a lifetime to isolate either a group in that way. I actually believe that healthy diversity leads to the best organizations. In the work world we&#8217;ve got organizations that were build largely by men and have tilted toward benefiting the aggressive and competitive traits. All women&#8217;s organizations tend to tilt toward being so consensus driven that it is hard to move forward. Neither is ideal but I think a blend creates a give and take that it better for everyone.</p><p>I think it is high time to re-think how we structure businesses in general &#8211; so here&#8217;s to business model innovation!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Renewal &#124; AccMan</title><link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/01/rethinking-the-role-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-397273</link> <dc:creator>Renewal &#124; AccMan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 02:27:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5240#comment-397273</guid> <description>[...] I had a wonderful conversation with someone whose gutsiness, determination and fearlessness I admire. It was [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I had a wonderful conversation with someone whose gutsiness, determination and fearlessness I admire. It was [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/27 queries in 0.058 seconds using disk

Served from: www.accmanpro.com @ 2010-03-12 03:46:47 -->