You are here: Home » Innovation » Is community the next step for vendors?

Is community the next step for vendors?

by Dennis Howlett on August 7, 2009

The notion of ‘community’ has always been something that software vendors want to nurture. In the past they were called ‘user groups’ or ‘forums.’ Many of them still exist but the emphasis has always been on support. Today I see a different trend.

The best example I know is the SAP Community Network. I am a member and SAP Mentor so have a good amount of knowledge about what it does and how it works. To say it is large would be a gross understatement: 1.7 million members (plus or minus 10%ish for counting errors) is a LOT of people. SCN has spawned some great ideas that have in turn become part of what SAP is about. It has also helped those who are the real ‘rock stars’ to shine.

More recently, individuals have stood up and created events of their own such as Inside Track where like minded people come together to discuss issues of importance to them. When I attended Inside Track London, I got the opportunity to both participate and film people interested in the education and certification debate. Since then, that debate has been taken forward and some of us hope to present a case for a fresh evaluation of what it means to be SAP Certified at the upcoming TechEd. I’ve been invited to Inside Track Bonn to present on ‘whatever’s pissing me off.’ Seriously. That was the message. That’s all goodness.

My point is that a thriving community helps strengthen everyone. The community benefits from new learnings, individuals benefit from seeing their contribution valued, elevated and ultimately actioned or taken on by others. Careers are made this way. The lead sponsoring vendor benefits because it sees how its customers are behaving, what matters to them and can formulate useful responses.

Most recently I notice that FreshBooks is hiring a community manager. With 800,000 signups since 2004, they’re another company that’s got many people in love with its ’stuff.’ The community aim?

We want to create the world’s largest, most active and most valued network of freelancers and very small business owners in the world. And we want them to share, network, support, learn and work with each other…

Our customers are professionals who take pride in their work and value customer relationships — and we like’m a heck of a lot. And while we certainly help them enjoy their invoicing… we’d like to help them out a lot more by connecting them with each other so they can share and learn together as a community.

See the difference between what companies like SAP FreshBooks and a few others are doing and that of the old ‘forums?’ It’s really about the connectedness where, as a user, you get the opportunity to discover new things, opportunities and learn. Learning environments are healthy environments. That’s why I see community as the next step for vendors. But of course the same could apply to professionals.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark
  • There is of course a downside to this, namely that companies see others "doing community" and immediately you see execs pulling out the power point and there's always a slide that says "launch community" I think this is still where the old and new are clashing as the new begin to realize that you don't "launch" a community but rather you "grow" it.

    Me, I've been doing online communities for something like 20+ years now (longer than I've been officially working) and started with a 300 Baud modem and a Telgard BBS system. So I've see the ups, downs and evolutions that communities tend to go through on both the positive and negative sides and I have to say being on the inside of the SAP Community Network and helping to shape it's future has been a thrilling experience but also a hard road to tow as well.

    Fellow Irregulars Susan Scrupski started the 2.0 Adoption Council which I've started to find to be a great place - it's mainly for internal evangelists around the introduction of 2.0 concepts into the enterprise but I've managed to find a ton of folks sharing their own experiences some of which have helped recently with planning for our up coming events. 2 years ago I felt alone, now as more and more companies are starting to understand the power of listening and giving their customers and partners a place to speak without barriers - well I'm not alone anymore and this space is really starting to show some excitement and cool things taking place. Who knows maybe next year there will be an event just for "community evangelists" from around the world and we can start working on better integration across communities and ecosystems.
  • Dennis,

    I definitely agree with you and the smartest vendors I work with in the SAP ecosystem are all contemplating how to build their own communities around their products - while maintaining a presence on SAP's own community network (SCN) and not duplicating what has already been built.

    In my view. SCN is not cited enough by analysts as one of SAP's true competitive advantages amongst its enterprise competitors. SCN and the Mentor Initiative you and I are a part of have boosted SAP's competitive advantage in any number of ways, from reaching a better understanding of key issues (such as the problem of the individual SAP developer and their license needs, something still being discussed/addressed obviously), rolling out new policies such as the new SCN terms of use, and creating tight feedback loops with customers and partners on product rollouts - not to mention Mentors having input on SAP projects ranging from certification course content to new online rollouts like SAP Learning on Demand. The list goes on and on but that gives some idea of the specific benefits.

    The problem I see, however, is that too many vendors with the happy notion of "let's build an online community" see it as yet another promotional channel. It may very well be that, but if it's framed that way, it is sure to fail. The thing about such communities, as I know you are aware since you often push this envelope yourself, is that vendors must be willing to embrace vigorous dissent. "Listening to criticism" sounds good in theory but some of those who offer the most invaluable feedback to vendors do it a way that is unsparing and can lack, shall we say, a certain tact. There is then the strong temptation on the vendors' part to censor such discussions, but once censoring starts to happen, that vendor community becomes muffled and insular and people go elsewhere (like Twitter even) to have a free place to sound off.

    So it takes quite a bit of backbone to listen to feedback that can be unfairly harsh but still incredibly useful. SAP I know has struggled with this also but to their credit I have yet to see a sign of censorship on SCN, though moderation certainly occurs and the difference can be debated. Moderation can be challenging also, figuring out to how to address issues of civility and also making sure that the new community platform is not abused for the purposes of shilling product. Sounds easy enough till a valued partner starts doing it and it has to be nipped in the bud without harming that relationship. And of course what happens if there is an apparent double standard where the vendor's own employees are shilling in their blogs but others are not allowed to?

    Basically "community" is some messy shit and it's not for the weak-willed nor a phrase to be thrown around lightly. Perhaps because of all these challenges, I believe those IT vendors that sort through this messiness as SAP has done and come out the other side with a popular platform will have a serious, serious edge.

    - Jon
  • Could not have put it better! Excellent contribution.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: