<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IFRS could well fail in the US</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/27/ifrs-could-well-fail-in-the-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/27/ifrs-could-well-fail-in-the-us/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise 2.0: what a crock (&#8221;alter Hut&#8221;) &#171; NUTs &#38; FUNKENSPRUNG</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/27/ifrs-could-well-fail-in-the-us/comment-page-1/#comment-6855</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise 2.0: what a crock (&#8221;alter Hut&#8221;) &#171; NUTs &#38; FUNKENSPRUNG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5446#comment-6855</guid>
		<description>[...] v judgment. In my accounting world that is best manifested by the debate among professionals re: the introduction of IFRS v US GAAP. This is all about rules v. judgment thinking. Herein lies the biggest conundrum. If you allow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] v judgment. In my accounting world that is best manifested by the debate among professionals re: the introduction of IFRS v US GAAP. This is all about rules v. judgment thinking. Herein lies the biggest conundrum. If you allow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The US does not get judgment &#124; called2account</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/27/ifrs-could-well-fail-in-the-us/comment-page-1/#comment-6854</link>
		<dc:creator>The US does not get judgment &#124; called2account</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5446#comment-6854</guid>
		<description>[...] IFRS could well fail in the US &#124; AccMan . IFRS requires (gasp) judgment and that’s something that’s anathema to the US way of doing things. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IFRS could well fail in the US | AccMan . IFRS requires (gasp) judgment and that’s something that’s anathema to the US way of doing things. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tax Research UK &#187; The US does not get judgment</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/27/ifrs-could-well-fail-in-the-us/comment-page-1/#comment-6853</link>
		<dc:creator>Tax Research UK &#187; The US does not get judgment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5446#comment-6853</guid>
		<description>[...] IFRS could well fail in the US &#124; AccMan . IFRS requires (gasp) judgment and that’s something that’s anathema to the US way of doing things. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IFRS could well fail in the US | AccMan . IFRS requires (gasp) judgment and that’s something that’s anathema to the US way of doing things. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise 2.0: what a crock &#124; Irregular Enterprise &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/08/27/ifrs-could-well-fail-in-the-us/comment-page-1/#comment-6852</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise 2.0: what a crock &#124; Irregular Enterprise &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5446#comment-6852</guid>
		<description>[...] v judgment. In my accounting world that is best manifested by the debate among professionals re: the introduction of IFRS v US GAAP. This is all about rules v. judgment thinking. Herein lies the biggest conundrum. If you allow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] v judgment. In my accounting world that is best manifested by the debate among professionals re: the introduction of IFRS v US GAAP. This is all about rules v. judgment thinking. Herein lies the biggest conundrum. If you allow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

