The firm of the future

by admin on September 1, 2009

in Innovation

Courtesy of a Tweet from @tomhood and others, I came across this 7 minute podcast featuring Ron Baker of the Verasage Institute that talks about the ‘firm of the future.’ Rather than bang the ‘billable hour is dead’ drum, Ron takes an alternative look at what professional firms should look like. He argues that instead of the old revenue driven model that equates to ‘people power x efficiency x hourly rate,’ the firm of the future looks to profitability as its driver. This equates to intellectual capital x effectiveness x price.

Ron then goes on to define each of these elements. His discussion around intellectual capital is interesting because he talks about intellectual capital being incapable of ownership except by those that have it – it is personal. Hence the fear that many firms have when staff walk out the door that they’re taking their IC, or as I would prefer to view it, intellectual property or IP, with them. Ron expands the notion of IC to include structural capital that equates to the physical location that firms deploy along with the knowledge management assets they use to hold IC. His last component is social capital which he describes as the environment in which professionals work such as their membership of ICAEW/CIMA/ACCA/AICPA, networks etc. Again, this last piece, socialcapital si something that Ron believes is individually owned.

He then talks about effectiveness as distinguished from efficiency, arguing that efficiency alone cannot differentiate the firm. In his world, effectiveness is all about a firm’s ability to provide thought leadership in topic specific areas or niches.

Finally, Ron mentions price but doesn’t expand on the topic. That’s a pity. I’m not convinced that price is a useful multiplier when it comes to profitability. It is an obvious determinant of profitability but is not the whole story.

Each of these elements is capable of much discussion but in providing this short summary of how he sees the firm of the future, Ron is laying down the foundation for building those new styles of firm.

Crucially, Ron lays to rest the Taylorian ‘time and motion’ idea that what professionals do can be equated to physical objects like the output of an automotive factory. There is an argument that says you can view an element of the firm in this manner and set yourself up accordingly. I know of firms that have done so very successfully such as SJD. But of itself, that will never deliver optimal results for everyone.

For those that look at this blog for tech signposts, then Ron’s ideas around social capital should hold considerable interest.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Finally, Ron mentions price but doesn’t expand on the topic. That’s a pity. I’m not convinced that price is a useful multiplier when it comes to profitability. It is an obvious determinant of profitability but is not the whole story.========================[url="http://thefinancefirm.com" rel="dofollow"]The Finance Firm[/url]

Finally, Ron mentions price but doesn’t expand on the topic. That’s a pity. I’m not convinced that price is a useful multiplier when it comes to profitability. It is an obvious determinant of profitability but is not the whole story.
========================
[url="http://thefinancefirm.com" rel="dofollow"]The Finance Firm[/url]

While it is true that employees control their own knowledge, the firm realizes the greatest value by combining the knowledge in its human capital with that of its relationship capital and structural capital (the knowledge that stays behind when the employees go home at night). Here's an illustration of what I mean: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brBwWqiSg8g

This is harder for professional service firms but it is the real frontier: what about your work processes can and should be turned into a repeatable process. Then you have scale and you have the potential to create lasting value....

Thanks Dennis, glad you found it interesting. This new business model is based on my book from 2003, The Firm of the Future, so I've been beating this drum for quite some time.

There are two more installments due out from this interview. I plan to do another one on pricing, which will get more specific.

As for price being a driver of profitability, there's no doubt it's the number one driver of profits, more than cost-cutting, or rainmaking, which is why Fortune 1000 companies have invested so much into the pricing function these past 30 years (UPS, e.g., has about 225 pricers in the USA alone).

Professional pricers have a saying: "Price for profit, innovate for growth." Value Pricing takes care of the former, effectiveness achieves the latter. Innovation is not very "efficient," such as Google's 20% time, where they come up with a lot of their new services.

Will Tweet the others when they are published.

Regards,
Ron

Ron Baker, Founder@ronaldbaker
VeraSage Institute www.verasage.com
Twitter

Previous post:

Next post: