<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The SaaS accounting questions you need to ask</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/01/the-saas-accounting-questions-you-need-to-ask/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/01/the-saas-accounting-questions-you-need-to-ask/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday’s Musing: The Hidden Value In SaaS Deployments</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/01/the-saas-accounting-questions-you-need-to-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-7052</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday’s Musing: The Hidden Value In SaaS Deployments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5640#comment-7052</guid>
		<description>[...] The SaaS accounting questions you need to ask [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The SaaS accounting questions you need to ask [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/01/the-saas-accounting-questions-you-need-to-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-7051</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5640#comment-7051</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed reading the post.

As I work at a company that&#039;s been doing SaaS for over ten years, I will agree that Mr. Howlett brings up very legitimate concerns that should be addressed when choosing a SaaS provider.

As new SaaS products pop up all over, it will be even more critical to fully understand your SaaS provider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed reading the post.</p>
<p>As I work at a company that&#039;s been doing SaaS for over ten years, I will agree that Mr. Howlett brings up very legitimate concerns that should be addressed when choosing a SaaS provider.</p>
<p>As new SaaS products pop up all over, it will be even more critical to fully understand your SaaS provider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/01/the-saas-accounting-questions-you-need-to-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-7050</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5640#comment-7050</guid>
		<description>Sorry Brandon - I should&#039;ve made the distinction - will update</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Brandon &#8211; I should&#039;ve made the distinction &#8211; will update</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandan</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/01/the-saas-accounting-questions-you-need-to-ask/comment-page-1/#comment-7049</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5640#comment-7049</guid>
		<description>Nice follow up to yesterday&#039;s discussions. One other important this to note regarding SAS70&#039;s (which many people gloss over). You get a SAS 70 Type I and a Type II. A type I is basically a report which states that the auditor agrees with the description of the process and the controls in place. A type II report actually gives a level of assurance, and the auditor has to test the controls for this report. Type I does not involve actual testing and therefore provides a much lower level of assurance. In my auditing days we saw quite a few clients being content with Type I&#039;s as they did not realize there was a diff - we would always have to perform quite a lot of additional work on the service providers which only provided Type I&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice follow up to yesterday&#039;s discussions. One other important this to note regarding SAS70&#039;s (which many people gloss over). You get a SAS 70 Type I and a Type II. A type I is basically a report which states that the auditor agrees with the description of the process and the controls in place. A type II report actually gives a level of assurance, and the auditor has to test the controls for this report. Type I does not involve actual testing and therefore provides a much lower level of assurance. In my auditing days we saw quite a few clients being content with Type I&#039;s as they did not realize there was a diff &#8211; we would always have to perform quite a lot of additional work on the service providers which only provided Type I&#039;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

