http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/02/might-social-networks-be-bad-for-your-fees/ never knowingly under opinionated Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:21:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/02/might-social-networks-be-bad-for-your-fees/comment-page-1/#comment-398829 Tax Research UK » Another great one from Dennis Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:27:31 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5647#comment-398829 [...] Credit to gapingvoid.com, and Dennis [...] [...] Credit to gapingvoid.com, and Dennis [...]

]]> http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/02/might-social-networks-be-bad-for-your-fees/comment-page-1/#comment-398795 Dennis Howlett Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:06:35 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5647#comment-398795 I hope I wasn't implying otherwise - in reality it was David's response that got me thinking down those lines. I hope I wasn’t implying otherwise – in reality it was David’s response that got me thinking down those lines.

]]> http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/02/might-social-networks-be-bad-for-your-fees/comment-page-1/#comment-398792 Mark Lee Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:46:53 +0000 http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5647#comment-398792 I have to admit that this is a better learning point to draw from the Kellogg research than the one on which I focused. Having said that I have addressed the time vs value based billing issue on a number of occasions on the Ambitious Accountants blog and think you'll find that we're in agreement as regards how fees should be determined. I have to admit that this is a better learning point to draw from the Kellogg research than the one on which I focused. Having said that I have addressed the time vs value based billing issue on a number of occasions on the Ambitious Accountants blog and think you’ll find that we’re in agreement as regards how fees should be determined.

]]>