<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud, on-premise or mixed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/18/cloud-on-premise-or-mixed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/18/cloud-on-premise-or-mixed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Need for Timely Software – SAP TechEd 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/18/cloud-on-premise-or-mixed/comment-page-1/#comment-7139</link>
		<dc:creator>The Need for Timely Software – SAP TechEd 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5782#comment-7139</guid>
		<description>[...] Cloud, on-premise or mixed? (accmanpro.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cloud, on-premise or mixed? (accmanpro.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/18/cloud-on-premise-or-mixed/comment-page-1/#comment-7138</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5782#comment-7138</guid>
		<description>In truth Jason they have a lot going on that no-one knows about but then given your remarks I&#039;m minded also of Microsoft. They seem to be in much the same boat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In truth Jason they have a lot going on that no-one knows about but then given your remarks I&#039;m minded also of Microsoft. They seem to be in much the same boat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Holden</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/18/cloud-on-premise-or-mixed/comment-page-1/#comment-7137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Holden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5782#comment-7137</guid>
		<description>It is no wonder Sage are losing out. In the beginning SAGE was King and rightly so, it created an affordable accounting package for the smaller business that most could use, but then like all &#8216;sloths&#8217; it has become bloated and slow to react.

It is a shame though, part of the Sage bashing culture is also due to its success, the UK has a nasty habit of trying to pull down those who do well, look at Tesco and all its &#8216;knockers&#8217;.

Another issue for Sage, it needs to look at why it was first successful, design something from ground up that works and not buy other companies and &#8216;add them on&#8217;.

Just my pennies worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is no wonder Sage are losing out. In the beginning SAGE was King and rightly so, it created an affordable accounting package for the smaller business that most could use, but then like all &lsquo;sloths&rsquo; it has become bloated and slow to react.</p>
<p>It is a shame though, part of the Sage bashing culture is also due to its success, the UK has a nasty habit of trying to pull down those who do well, look at Tesco and all its &lsquo;knockers&rsquo;.</p>
<p>Another issue for Sage, it needs to look at why it was first successful, design something from ground up that works and not buy other companies and &lsquo;add them on&rsquo;.</p>
<p>Just my pennies worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

