<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sage&#039;s retarded Windows 7 readiness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/comment-page-1/#comment-7168</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 19:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5855#comment-7168</guid>
		<description>I simply can&#039;t print on my W7 system running 2010 and have to use  a non-W7 machine. Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply can&#39;t print on my W7 system running 2010 and have to use  a non-W7 machine. Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/comment-page-1/#comment-9978</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5855#comment-9978</guid>
		<description>I simply can&#039;t print on my W7 system running 2010 and have to use  a non-W7 machine. Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply can&#8217;t print on my W7 system running 2010 and have to use  a non-W7 machine. Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/comment-page-1/#comment-10809</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5855#comment-10809</guid>
		<description>I simply can&#039;t print on my W7 system running 2010 and have to use  a non-W7 machine. Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply can&#8217;t print on my W7 system running 2010 and have to use  a non-W7 machine. Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff D.</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/comment-page-1/#comment-7165</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5855#comment-7165</guid>
		<description>Could it have anything to do with Dynamics being in direct competition with lots of Sage products?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it have anything to do with Dynamics being in direct competition with lots of Sage products?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr_Donut</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/comment-page-1/#comment-7164</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr_Donut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5855#comment-7164</guid>
		<description>Could it have anything to do with Dynamics being in direct competition with lots of Sage products?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it have anything to do with Dynamics being in direct competition with lots of Sage products?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff D.</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/comment-page-1/#comment-9483</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5855#comment-9483</guid>
		<description>Could it have anything to do with Dynamics being in direct competition with lots of Sage products?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it have anything to do with Dynamics being in direct competition with lots of Sage products?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/comment-page-1/#comment-7166</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5855#comment-7166</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an expensive and thorough process to get applications &quot;Certified for Windows&quot;, I&#039;ve been through it more than once.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However Windows 7 was RTM&#039;ed in July, was available as a Release Candidate at the end of April and was available as a beta in January. There is no excuse to not have your Windows software working for Windows given the amount of time and, as a Microsoft partner, the resources available to do so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder what&#039;s happening at Sage HQ and if anyone is steering the boat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s an expensive and thorough process to get applications &#8220;Certified for Windows&#8221;, I&#39;ve been through it more than once.</p>
<p>However Windows 7 was RTM&#39;ed in July, was available as a Release Candidate at the end of April and was available as a beta in January. There is no excuse to not have your Windows software working for Windows given the amount of time and, as a Microsoft partner, the resources available to do so.</p>
<p>I wonder what&#39;s happening at Sage HQ and if anyone is steering the boat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/comment-page-1/#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5855#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an expensive and thorough process to get applications &quot;Certified for Windows&quot;, I&#039;ve been through it more than once.However Windows 7 was RTM&#039;ed in July, was available as a Release Candidate at the end of April and was available as a beta in January. There is no excuse to not have your Windows software working for Windows given the amount of time and, as a Microsoft partner, the resources available to do so.I wonder what&#039;s happening at Sage HQ and if anyone is steering the boat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s an expensive and thorough process to get applications &quot;Certified for Windows&quot;, I&#039;ve been through it more than once.However Windows 7 was RTM&#039;ed in July, was available as a Release Candidate at the end of April and was available as a beta in January. There is no excuse to not have your Windows software working for Windows given the amount of time and, as a Microsoft partner, the resources available to do so.I wonder what&#039;s happening at Sage HQ and if anyone is steering the boat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/comment-page-1/#comment-9476</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5855#comment-9476</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an expensive and thorough process to get applications &quot;Certified for Windows&quot;, I&#039;ve been through it more than once.

However Windows 7 was RTM&#039;ed in July, was available as a Release Candidate at the end of April and was available as a beta in January. There is no excuse to not have your Windows software working for Windows given the amount of time and, as a Microsoft partner, the resources available to do so.

I wonder what&#039;s happening at Sage HQ and if anyone is steering the boat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an expensive and thorough process to get applications &#8220;Certified for Windows&#8221;, I&#8217;ve been through it more than once.</p>
<p>However Windows 7 was RTM&#8217;ed in July, was available as a Release Candidate at the end of April and was available as a beta in January. There is no excuse to not have your Windows software working for Windows given the amount of time and, as a Microsoft partner, the resources available to do so.</p>
<p>I wonder what&#8217;s happening at Sage HQ and if anyone is steering the boat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon_g</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/10/29/sages-retarded-windows-7-readiness/comment-page-1/#comment-7167</link>
		<dc:creator>simon_g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5855#comment-7167</guid>
		<description>Its not very difficult to get Windows 7 certified. As I now work with the ERP developers, they tell me that getting SYSPRO certification for Win 7 was a major hassle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not very difficult to get Windows 7 certified. As I now work with the ERP developers, they tell me that getting SYSPRO certification for Win 7 was a major hassle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

