<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On being No.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7360</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5978#comment-7360</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments Dennis.  &quot;tetchy&quot;?  Nah, I&#039;ve got cream for that.   Keep being you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments Dennis.  &#8220;tetchy&#8221;?  Nah, I&#39;ve got cream for that.   Keep being you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7359</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5978#comment-7359</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments Dennis.  &quot;tetchy&quot;?  Nah, I&#039;ve got cream for that.   Keep being you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments Dennis.  &quot;tetchy&quot;?  Nah, I&#039;ve got cream for that.   Keep being you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5978#comment-9598</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments Dennis.  &quot;tetchy&quot;?  Nah, I&#039;ve got cream for that.   Keep being you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments Dennis.  &#8220;tetchy&#8221;?  Nah, I&#8217;ve got cream for that.   Keep being you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisyeh</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7361</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisyeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5978#comment-7361</guid>
		<description>Dennis, you have to protect the brand.  Becoming a nice guy would dilute the identity!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, well-deserved honor.  Congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, you have to protect the brand.  Becoming a nice guy would dilute the identity!</p>
<p>Seriously, well-deserved honor.  Congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisyeh</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7358</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisyeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5978#comment-7358</guid>
		<description>Dennis, you have to protect the brand.  Becoming a nice guy would dilute the identity!Seriously, well-deserved honor.  Congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, you have to protect the brand.  Becoming a nice guy would dilute the identity!Seriously, well-deserved honor.  Congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Yeh</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9556</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Yeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5978#comment-9556</guid>
		<description>Dennis, you have to protect the brand.  Becoming a nice guy would dilute the identity!

Seriously, well-deserved honor.  Congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, you have to protect the brand.  Becoming a nice guy would dilute the identity!</p>
<p>Seriously, well-deserved honor.  Congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dahowlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7363</link>
		<dc:creator>dahowlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5978#comment-7363</guid>
		<description>@ric - thanks for that. I&#039;m nervous of &#039;lists&#039; as they are always biased. I guess the good news is that the list criteria (however flawed) was made transparent. I am still surprised I appeared in this manner. But I&#039;m also humbled that enough people contribute to me verbiage such that I am up there with peeps I admire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ric &#8211; thanks for that. I&#39;m nervous of &#39;lists&#39; as they are always biased. I guess the good news is that the list criteria (however flawed) was made transparent. I am still surprised I appeared in this manner. But I&#39;m also humbled that enough people contribute to me verbiage such that I am up there with peeps I admire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aqualung</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>aqualung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5978#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>Dennis - congrats. Although you could argue about specifics (as with all &#039;league ladders&#039;), I think this is a pretty impressive list to be part of - just reward for years of calling bluffs and bullsh*t!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis &#8211; congrats. Although you could argue about specifics (as with all &#39;league ladders&#39;), I think this is a pretty impressive list to be part of &#8211; just reward for years of calling bluffs and bullsh*t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dahowlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7357</link>
		<dc:creator>dahowlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5978#comment-7357</guid>
		<description>@ric - thanks for that. I&#039;m nervous of &#039;lists&#039; as they are always biased. I guess the good news is that the list criteria (however flawed) was made transparent. I am still surprised I appeared in this manner. But I&#039;m also humbled that enough people contribute to me verbiage such that I am up there with peeps I admire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ric &#8211; thanks for that. I&#039;m nervous of &#039;lists&#039; as they are always biased. I guess the good news is that the list criteria (however flawed) was made transparent. I am still surprised I appeared in this manner. But I&#039;m also humbled that enough people contribute to me verbiage such that I am up there with peeps I admire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dahowlett</title>
		<link>http://www.accmanpro.com/2009/12/03/on-being-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9548</link>
		<dc:creator>dahowlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accmanpro.com/?p=5978#comment-9548</guid>
		<description>@ric - thanks for that. I&#039;m nervous of &#039;lists&#039; as they are always biased. I guess the good news is that the list criteria (however flawed) was made transparent. I am still surprised I appeared in this manner. But I&#039;m also humbled that enough people contribute to me verbiage such that I am up there with peeps I admire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ric &#8211; thanks for that. I&#8217;m nervous of &#8216;lists&#8217; as they are always biased. I guess the good news is that the list criteria (however flawed) was made transparent. I am still surprised I appeared in this manner. But I&#8217;m also humbled that enough people contribute to me verbiage such that I am up there with peeps I admire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

